Classical Classical Dynamics: A Contemporary Approach by José and Saletan

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on "Classical Dynamics: A Contemporary Approach" by Jorge José and Eugene Saletan, highlighting both strengths and weaknesses. A major drawback noted is the use of summation notation throughout the text, which can detract from readability. However, the book is praised for its encyclopedic content and extensive bibliography, although it sometimes lacks justification for certain concepts, such as the principle of least action. The text excels in providing geometrical intuition, making it a valuable supplement to other works, particularly Arnold's, by aiding in the visualization of classical dynamics. Overall, while it may not serve well as a standalone textbook, it is highly recommended as a supplementary resource.

For those who have used this book

  • Lightly Recommend

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lightly don't Recommend

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Strongly don't Recommend

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    1
Physics news on Phys.org
The biggest con to this text is its notation; its insistant to use summation notation for every equation made the entire read an eyesore.

Content-wise, however, it is encyclopedic, exemplified by an impressive bibliography. This is both good and bad. For example, some texts stress that the principle of least action is actually the principle of stationary action. José and Saletan tells us exactly what Lagrangians minimize action...without justification. In fact, because the book is so encyclopedic, a vast amount of material under justified, the most egregious example being Darboux's theorem. Because of this, I am not sure I can recommend this as a stand-alone text for any course. However, as a supplement, it excells.

José and Saletan stress geometrical intuition as a way to decode the equations of dynamics. In this endeavor, the text is a success. I think that because of this, the text makes a great supplement to Arnold's masterpiece, helping the reader visualize the geometrical framework that Arnold uses to construct classical dynamics. Overall, I strongly recommend the text.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
14K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
34
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top