Classical Classical Dynamics: A Contemporary Approach by José and Saletan

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on "Classical Dynamics: A Contemporary Approach" by Jorge José and Eugene Saletan, highlighting both strengths and weaknesses. A major drawback noted is the use of summation notation throughout the text, which can detract from readability. However, the book is praised for its encyclopedic content and extensive bibliography, although it sometimes lacks justification for certain concepts, such as the principle of least action. The text excels in providing geometrical intuition, making it a valuable supplement to other works, particularly Arnold's, by aiding in the visualization of classical dynamics. Overall, while it may not serve well as a standalone textbook, it is highly recommended as a supplementary resource.

For those who have used this book

  • Lightly Recommend

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lightly don't Recommend

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Strongly don't Recommend

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    1
Physics news on Phys.org
The biggest con to this text is its notation; its insistant to use summation notation for every equation made the entire read an eyesore.

Content-wise, however, it is encyclopedic, exemplified by an impressive bibliography. This is both good and bad. For example, some texts stress that the principle of least action is actually the principle of stationary action. José and Saletan tells us exactly what Lagrangians minimize action...without justification. In fact, because the book is so encyclopedic, a vast amount of material under justified, the most egregious example being Darboux's theorem. Because of this, I am not sure I can recommend this as a stand-alone text for any course. However, as a supplement, it excells.

José and Saletan stress geometrical intuition as a way to decode the equations of dynamics. In this endeavor, the text is a success. I think that because of this, the text makes a great supplement to Arnold's masterpiece, helping the reader visualize the geometrical framework that Arnold uses to construct classical dynamics. Overall, I strongly recommend the text.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
15K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
34
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top