Classical Dynamics: Given v(x), find F(x), x(t), and F(t).

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework problem in classical dynamics where the speed of a particle is given by v(x) = (alpha)*x^(-n). Participants are tasked with finding the force F(x), the position x(t), and the force as a function of time F(t). One user calculates the acceleration and force but receives feedback about the correct application of the chain rule for acceleration. The conversation highlights the need for careful differentiation and integration techniques to solve for x(t) and emphasizes the importance of including constants of integration. Overall, the thread illustrates common challenges in applying classical mechanics principles to solve differential equations.
BlueFalcon
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The speed of a particle of mass m varies with the distance x as v(x) = (alpha)*x-n.
Assume v(x=0) = 0 at t = 0.
(a) Find the force F(x) responsible.
(b) Determine x(t) and
(c) F(t)

Homework Equations


Likely:
F = ma

The Attempt at a Solution


I obtain
a(x) = -n(alpha)x-(n+1)
So
F(x) = ma(x) = -mn(alpha)x-(n+1)

The back of book claims:
F(x) = -mna*x-(2n+1)

They use 'a' for the answer, I think they mean alpha, unless a IS alpha...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi BlueFalcon, welcome to PF!:smile:

BlueFalcon said:
I obtain
a(x) = -n(alpha)x-(n+1)

Careful, acceleration is the change in velocity with respect to time, not position; you need to use the chain rule:

\frac{d}{dt}v(x)=\frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}=v\frac{dv}{dx}

P.S. In the future, problems like this should probably be posted in the introductory physics forum instead.:wink:
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Hi BlueFalcon, welcome to PF!:smile:



Careful, acceleration is the change in velocity with respect to time, not position; you need to use the chain rule:

\frac{d}{dt}v(x)=\frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}=v\frac{dv}{dx}

P.S. In the future, problems like this should probably be posted in the introductory physics forum instead.:wink:

BAH!

I swear I tried that method and got a bunch of warrgarrbllll.

Thanks.

I can't believe I messed it up that bad.
 
Although, I can't seem to find x(t). Running into the same wargarbl.
 
Hint: You have a separable ODE for x(t):

\frac{dx}{dt}=v(x)\implies \int \frac{dx}{v(x)}=\int dt

(Don't forget the constant(s) of integration!:wink:)
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top