In feynman's quantum mechanics and path integrals,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

he makes the following claim:

"Now if we move the path by a small amount dx, small on the classical scale, the change in S (the action), is likewise small on the classical scale, but not when measured in the tiny unit of reduced planck's constant h. These small changes in path will, generally, make enormous changes in phase, and our cosine or sine will oscillate exceedingly rapidly between plus and minus values. The total contribution will then add to zero.

I have difficulty mathematically showing this.

Thecontributionof the action along a path j, [tex] \phi_j[x(t)]=e^{(i/h)S_i[x(t)]} [/tex] , k constant and [tex]S_j[x(t)] [/tex] is the action along the path j

[tex] K(b,a) = \sum_{over all paths}\phi[x(t)] = \phi_1[x(t)]+\phi_2[x(t)]+...+\phi_N[x(t)] = e^{(i/h)S_1[x(t)]}+e^{(i/h)S_2[x(t)]}+ ... +e^{(i/h)S_N[x(t)]} [/tex]

Using Euler's identity,

[tex]K(b,a) = cos((i/h)S_1[x(t)]) + i*sin((i/h)S_1[x(t)]) + cos((i/h)S_2[x(t)]) + i*sin((i/h)S_2[x(t)])+... + cos((i/h)S_N[x(t)]) + i*sin((i/h)S_N[x(t)]) [/tex]

In the classical limit where [tex]S_i >> h[/tex] :

Let's assume that the action [tex]S_1[/tex] has the least action, and all other paths differ from [tex]S_1[/tex] by [tex]ds[/tex]

Then [tex] K(b,a) = cos((i/h)S_1[x(t)]) + i*sin((i/h)S_1[x(t)]) [/tex]

since Feynmann claims that:

[tex] cos((i/h)S_2[x(t)]) + i*sin((i/h)S_2[x(t)]) ... + cos((i/h)S_N[x(t)]) + i*sin((i/h)S_N[x(t)] = 0 [/tex] as they "cancel each other out"

But what I don't understand is that, because no matter how large S_N becomes in the classical limit (ie for objects of very large mass), [tex] cos(S_N) \leq 1 [/tex], so how exactly do they cancel out?

So all paths that are far away from the path of least action is NOT important so long as the action S >> h? What exactly is >>, ie is 10^2 bigger, 10^3 bigger? How about the action of the rotational and translational movement for single 8 carbon polymer?

Also, at molecular mass and time scale do we start considering it to be "classic"?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Classical limit of the path integral

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Classical limit path | Date |
---|---|

Radiation reaction in the classical limit of QED? | Nov 25, 2015 |

Different classical limits of quantum mechanics | May 20, 2015 |

Classical Limit of a Quantum Harmonic Oscillator | Mar 24, 2015 |

Schrödinger Equation in the classical limit | Oct 11, 2014 |

Classical Limit formula for differential cross section for Hard Sphere | May 28, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**