Classical Mechanics Textbook: Beyond Algebra Required?

AI Thread Summary
A college-level Classical Mechanics textbook typically requires knowledge beyond basic algebra, including multivariable calculus. Mastering multivariable calculus will aid in understanding the material, but a solid grasp of differential equations is also often assumed. For introductory courses, however, a basic understanding of single-variable calculus may suffice. The discussion highlights the importance of both calculus and differential equations for deeper comprehension of classical mechanics. Overall, a well-rounded mathematical foundation is essential for success in advanced mechanics studies.
jhooper3581
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Okay, I have this textbook about Classical Mechanics. It is NOT a high school textbook, it's like a college textbook, which requires beyond algebra. I also have calculus textbook, but I have not mastered multivariable calculus yet. If I do master this, will it help me finish Classical Mechanics, or does differential equations textbook also required?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you're dealing with classical mechanics on a level where you require multivariable calculus, you're likely also on a level where there is an assumed knowledge of differential equations, and potentially variational techniques.

A rudimentary understanding of single variable calculus should be all one needs math wise for a general, introductory college mechanics course.
 
Thanks for the reply.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
39
Views
7K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top