Classical Mechanics: Torque, Angular Momentum & Origins

AI Thread Summary
In classical mechanics, torque and angular momentum are essential concepts used for problem-solving in rotational dynamics, with historical roots tracing back to figures like Aristotle and Archimedes. These quantities are conserved in interactions, allowing predictions about outcomes when external forces or torques are absent. Understanding the rates of change of these quantities is crucial for analyzing systems under external influences. The evolution of these concepts is tied to the contributions of numerous scientists throughout history. A deeper study of the history of physics can enhance comprehension of how these foundational principles were established.
person_random_normal
Messages
165
Reaction score
10
In classical physics , specifically in rotational mechanics we have concepts of torque , angular momentum and their extensions. We widely use them in problem solving but how were they defined , what was the basis of their definition , was all that purely experimental and most importantly who did that ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aristotle (384-322 B.C) might be the earliest writing but the principles of levers must have been known 1000's of years earlier.

Edit: Archimedes also (287-212 BC)
 
Welcome to PF Shreyas!

Any quantity that is conserved in an interaction will be useful because it allows us to predict what the results of an interaction will be. Since momentum, energy, angular momentum will be conserved interactions, in the absence of external effects such as external force or external torque or external energy sinks, these quantities will be important. When these quantities change due to external effects, the rates of change will be important to keep track of (Force = dp/dt = dE/dx; Torque = dL/dt;) in order to determine the final values.

You should study the history of science/physics to better appreciate how these concepts evolved. These concepts were developed due to the work of many great scientists.

AM
 
where may i find that ? some link ...
 
I actually mean to ask, how is a particular physical quantity defined so that it rightly describes quantum of a physical interaction ?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top