Classical Physics - Pulley Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a massless string over a massless pulley, with two hoops of different masses and radii. The participants are tasked with determining the tension in the string while considering the dynamics of the system in a gravitational field.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to relate the tension to the reduced mass and questions whether the hoops are moving. Some participants explore the relationship between torque, angular acceleration, and linear acceleration of the hoops. Others discuss the implications of center of mass acceleration and the conservation of string.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering various insights and equations. There is a mix of attempts to derive relationships between tension, acceleration, and torque, with some expressing frustration over the complexity of the problem. Guidance has been provided regarding the use of torque and the relationship between linear and angular quantities.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the number of equations and unknowns, as well as the application of conservation principles. Some participants note the importance of correctly identifying the nature of the hoops and their motion.

danny271828
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
A massless string is placed over a massless pulley, and each end is wound around and fastened to a vertical hoop. The hoops have masses M1 and M2 and radii R1 and R2. The apparatus is placed in a uniform gravitation field g and released with each end of the string aligned along the field.

I have to show that the tension is T = gM1M2/(M1+M2)

I can sort of solve the problem by just saying that (M1M2)/(M1+M2) is the reduced mass. Then all we have to do is say the tension is balanced with the weight, so that T = Mg = gM1M2/(M1+M2). But then doesn't this imply that the hoop isn't moving? I think I'm missing something here... It is also important to realize that both hoops are rolling down the string so the acceleration of one hoop downward is not necessarily the acceleration of the other one upward... Any help / hints would be appreciated... thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
<statement retracted>
 
Last edited:
<statement retracted>
 
Last edited:
Try this. Each hoop has a torque on it of T times the appropriate radius. This determines the angular acceleration alpha of each hoop. Let s be the amount of string as a function of time. Then I claim s''=a1+a2=R1*alpha1+R2*alpha2 where the a's are the linear acceleration of each hoop. (The sum of the center of mass accelerations determines the second derivative of the length of string but the amount is also determined by the angular accelerations). Put this together with the usual force balance diagram for the vertical forces on each hoop and you will get what you want.
 
BlackWyvern said:
I just checked.

Your formula is supposed to be:

[tex]T = \frac{2gmM}{(M + m)}[/tex]

That's the result if the hoops don't spin.
 
I see.
<edits>
 
ok I'm here... about to pull my hair out
 
Can you work out a1 and a2 from linear force balance? Can you work out alpha1 and alpha2 from moment of inertia and torque? Let's get started... Do you accept the equality of the two expressions for s''? Does it seem right?
 
yes to all
 
  • #10
so just using T - M1g = M1A1
and T - M2g = M2A2
 
  • #11
but these accelerations are center of mass acceleration for each hoop
 
  • #12
and the equations for s'' make perfect sense
 
  • #13
My convention was to label positive acceleration down. Suggest you do the same if you want s''=a1+a2. Now the rotational part.
 
  • #14
danny271828 said:
but these accelerations are center of mass acceleration for each hoop

Center of mass acceleration is also related to the rates of string being played out. Think about it.
 
  • #15
and Torque1 = Inertia_hoop1*alpha1 = Tension*R1
Torque2 = Inertia_hoop2*alpha2 = Tension*R2
 
  • #16
Doing great! Put in the I's, solve for the alphas and put into the s'' equation along with the a's.
 
  • #17
hmm having trouble relating alphas to Acom
 
  • #18
oh just A = alpha*r right?
 
  • #19
hmm that's tangential though not center of mass accel
 
  • #20
and Inertia1 = (1/2)MR1^2
Inertia2 = (1/2)MR2^2
 
  • #21
Individually the tangential accelerations DON'T have to equal the linear accelerations. I only claimed the sums do (due to the seldom used physics law "conservation of string"). :)
 
  • #22
danny271828 said:
and Inertia1 = (1/2)MR1^2
Inertia2 = (1/2)MR2^2

Dump the (1/2). It's a hoop, not a disk. I made that mistake.
 
  • #23
so I am getting these equations

M1R1alpha1 = T = M2R2alpha2
 
  • #24
I believe that.
 
  • #25
so T = ((M1 + M2)s'')/2
 
  • #26
oops nevermind
 
  • #27
You can forget s'' now. Just use a1+a2=R1*alpha1+R2*alpha2.
 
  • #28
hmm but that doesn't make sense does it? then M1a1 = T = M2a2 which means the tension is the only force present
 
  • #29
danny271828 said:
hmm but that doesn't make sense does it? then M1a1 = T = M2a2 which means the tension is the only force present

It means tension is the only force that produces a torque. Gravity doesn't, it acts at the center of mass=center of rotation.
 
  • #30
ok now I am just going in circles
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
37
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K