Classical uncertainty principles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the second uncertainty principle, ΔωΔt ∼ 1, from the first uncertainty principle, ΔxΔk ∼ 1. The user demonstrates their work by relating position and time through velocity, leading to the expression VΔtΔk ∼ 1. They correctly apply the group velocity concept, V_group = Δω/Δk, to transition between the two principles. The user expresses initial uncertainty about the legality of their approach but concludes that it is valid since uncertainty principles apply to wave packets. The derivation is affirmed as correct and well-structured.
danoonez
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Please check my work.

Using the first uncertainty principle:

<br /> \Delta x \Delta k \sim 1<br />

derive the second uncertainty principle:

<br /> \Delta \omega \Delta t \sim 1<br />


My work:

<br /> \Delta x \Delta k \sim 1<br />

<br /> \frac {\Delta x} {\Delta t} = V \Rightarrow \Delta x = V \Delta t<br />

<br /> V \Delta t \Delta k \sim 1<br />

<br /> V_\textrm {group} = \frac {\Delta \omega} {\Delta k}<br />

<br /> \frac {\Delta \omega} {\Delta k} \Delta t \Delta k \sim 1<br />

<br /> \frac {\Delta k} {\Delta k} \Delta \omega \Delta t \sim 1<br />

<br /> \Delta \omega \Delta t \sim 1<br />

What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good to me. Right on man. What were you uncertain about when you wrote this?
 
Ed Quanta said:
Looks good to me. Right on man. What were you uncertain about when you wrote this?


I wasn't sure if my use of

V_\textrm {group} = \frac {\Delta \omega} {\Delta k}<br />

was legal. But then I realized that the uncertainty principles are used for wave packets so it was fine.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top