Clebsch-Gordan coeffs, special cases

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jesssa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clebsch-gordan
Jesssa
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm not sure whether I should have posted this in main Quantum mechanics thread because it's not really regarding homework, but I posted it in here just to be safe.

I was wondering, is there a way to derive the expression for these coefficients without the use of the general CGC formula?

For example, the J=0 case (this is taken from wikipedia)

65a3e02b0a4b4e80f8d539efb5c908aa.png


The 1/sqrt term is clear but the (-1)^.. term not so much, is there a way to find this coefficient?

I have read it requires the use of spinors and so on but I was wondering if there was a more simple way?

I found only a derivation of the CGC using only binomial expansions, but it was difficult to see exactly how they saw the starting point, it seemed like it must have been educated guesses until worked.

Thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps I am misreading this, since you mention spinors, but aren't j_1 and m_1 simply integers? If so then (-1)^{j_1- m_2) is +1 if [iterx]j_1[/itex] and m_1 have the same parity (both even or both odd) and +1 if they have different parity.
 
Thanks for replying HallsofIvy,

I understand what you have posted, but do you know how you get the (-1)^{j_1- m_1} term in the expression? I know, if you consider the formula it comes from the Wigner 3-j but I'm interested in finding out where it comes from (intuitively, if it is possible).

When I first saw the state, intuitively I saw the normalization factor 1/sqrt.. but I didn't expect/understand where the (-1)^{j_1- m_1} was coming from.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top