I Clock Thought Exp: A Light-Year Time Paradox

ZawL
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
This is a thought experiment I came up with this evening. It must surely have been considered before but I couldn't find any reference and I've come up with it independently.

NASA has positioned a clock in Earth's thermosphere that can be viewed from outer space with a powerful enough telescope and activates it just as the time hits New Year's on 1 Jan 2020. Aliens live on planet XYZ one light year away from earth. They have been monitoring Earth for a while and notice the clock as soon as it is activated. They send a being in a spaceship towards Earth at close to the speed of light. The being constantly watches the clock as he approaches Earth (except when rotation of Earth means the clock isn't visible to him). Since the light from the clock takes one year to reach planet XYZ, the aliens first notice the clock when it is 1 Jan 2021 on Earth, although they will see the time on the clock as 1 Jan 2020 on XYZ. The alien traveling towards the Earth will take 1 year to reach it, so when he arrives to Earth, the clock will show 1 Jan 2022. He has been watching the clock go from 1 Jan 2020 to 1 Jan 2022 in the year it takes him to reach Earth from the moment he first saw the time on the clock. My questions are, how does he observe two years' worth of clock ticks in the space of 1 year, and does he perceive the clock ticking as we do on Earth, ie one second in the space of one second?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The alien sees the Earth's clock almost infinitely fast. Because of Lorentz contraction, the alien takes an almost infinitely short time (according to the alien) to get to the Earth.

In terms of mathematics, the alien sees the Earth's clock ticking faster (setting ##c = 1##) by the Doppler shift fact of

$$\sqrt{\frac{1+v}{1-v}}.$$

The time taken by the alien (according top the alien) for the trip is distance/speed, where the distance (according to the alien) is a Lorentz contraction of 1 light-year, i.e., ##\sqrt{1-v^2}## light-years. The time that the alien sees elapse on the Earth's clock is (rate of ticking seen) times time for trip. Putting this together gives

$$\sqrt{\frac{1+v}{1-v}} \frac{\sqrt{1-v^2}}{v} = \sqrt{\frac{1+v}{1-v}} \frac{\sqrt{\left(1-v\right) \left(1+v\right)}}{v} = \frac{1}{v} +1.$$

In the limit that ##v## approaches one (light speed), the time that the alien see elapse on the Earth's clock is 2 years.

Edit: Note that this agrees with the results according to people on Earth. According to Earth, there is no Lorentz contraction for the alien's trip, i.e., the aliens travel a distance of 1 (light-years), and the time (according Earth) for the alien's trip is distance/speed ##=1/v##. According to Earth, the alien's trip started one year after the clock turned on, so, again, ##1/v +1##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes m4r35n357 and ZawL
Thank you! Your answer is explained really well and makes complete sense to me. I've only read about relativity in popular science media but maybe I should pick up a textbook and study the details.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top