Closed form expression for the partition function Z using the Canonical Ensemble

haitrungdo82
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm looking for a closed form expression for the partition function Z using the Canonical Ensemble



Homework Equations


epsilon_j - epsilon_j-1 = delta e
Z = Sum notation(j=0...N) e^(-beta*j*delta e)
beta = 1/(k_B*T)
t = (k_B*T)/delta e
N is the number of excited states

The Attempt at a Solution


I am given Z = Sum notation(j=0...N) e^(-beta*j*delta e). But the question asks me
to graph (in MathCAD) Z vs. t, where t = (k_B*T)/delta e. So, if I substitute t = (k_B*T)/delta e into the original Z, then Z becomes Z = Sum notation (j=0...N) e^-(j/t). Then I sketched Z vs. t for N = 25. It is fine!

However, then I have to sketch Z vs. t for N appoaches infinitive. This is a problem. My Professor told me that, for this case, I have to use the closed form of Z. The only closed form expression that I know is Z = e^[1-(lambda_1/k_B)]. But..."lambda_1" doesn't make sense to me. Specifically, I'm looking for a closed form expression that relates the parameters that I am given, or a definition of "lambda_1" that includes the given parameters. When I know it, I will be able to make a graph.

Could anyone help me, please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sum of e^(-j/t) over j is a geometric series. It's r^j where r=e^(-1/t). Look up 'geometric series'. You shouldn't have any problem finding a closed form expression for the sum over j from 0 to infinity.
 
Dick said:
The sum of e^(-j/t) over j is a geometric series. It's r^j where r=e^(-1/t). Look up 'geometric series'. You shouldn't have any problem finding a closed form expression for the sum over j from 0 to infinity.



Hi Dick! I was able to sketch the graph thanks to your advice. Good job!
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top