Closed form for geometricish series (index squared in the exponent)?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding a closed form for the series ∑_{k=0}^n x^{k^2}. It is noted that no referenced closed form exists for the finite sum, while the infinite sum has a known closed form involving the Jacobi theta function. The user seeks a lower bound for a modified sum that includes terms like x^k and x^{k(k+1)/2}, particularly as n approaches infinity. The user expresses a need for a lower bound that reflects the initial increasing behavior of the sum before it decreases. The conversation highlights the challenge of deriving useful bounds for these series.
lasindi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Closed form for "geometricish" series (index squared in the exponent)?

Hi all,

Is there a nice closed form for the following series?

\sum_{k=0}^n x^{k^2}

Even a decently tight upper bound and lower bound would be nice (obviously it is bounded by the corresponding geometric series \sum x^k, but is there anything better?).

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi !
As far as I know, there is no referenced closed form for the finite sum x^k² , k=0 to n.
The closed form for the infinite sum x^k² k=0 to infinity, with -1<x<1, is =(theta(0 , x)+1)/2 , involving the Jacobi theta function.
 
Thanks for the reply! It turned out that the plain old geometric upper bound was sufficient for what I was doing before, but now I need a lower bound for the following sum for x \in (0,1).

<br /> \sum_{k=0}^n [x^k + x^{k(k+1)/2} - 1]<br />

Clearly as n goes to infinity, this sum goes to negative infinity, but first it will increase with n and then decrease. I want a lower bound that captures that beginning increasing part. I don't really understand much about the Jacobi theta function so I'm not sure if it would be useful here too...

Essentially what I need is a closed form lower bound so that I can solve an inequality for n.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top