Closed integral problem: field in the plane of a magnetic dipole

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a magnetic field problem using Biot-Savart's law, specifically for a magnetic dipole representing the Earth. The original poster struggles with integrating a complex expression involving angles and distances, leading to confusion about approximations made in their calculations. Participants emphasize the importance of maintaining accuracy in angle approximations to avoid significant errors in results. They suggest using small angle approximations and simplifying integrals to achieve the correct answer. The poster ultimately gains confidence in handling closed integrals and the associated mathematical techniques.
Order
Messages
96
Reaction score
3
I have read about Biot-Savarts law but I have no idea how to solve it when the curve is dependent of some variable. My books in mathematics don't help, nor my books in physics. You are welcome to give me a link where I can read about this, but first let me know if I have got it right this far. Now, to the problem!

Homework Statement


The magnetic field of the Earth is found to fall off according to an inverse cube law at several Earth radii. The field can thus be roughly described in terms of a magnetic dipole at the centre of the Earth. If the field strength is 10-4 G at 15 Earth radii in the equatorial plane what is the magentic dipole moment of the Earth? (Radius of Earth≈6000 km.)


Homework Equations


\textbf{B}(\textbf{r})= \frac{\mu_0 I}{4 \pi} \oint_s \frac{d\textbf{l´}\times(\textbf{r-r´)}}{|\textbf{r-r´}|^3}


The Attempt at a Solution


So I want to find out the magnetic field of the dipole at a large distance. So first I made a sketch of the problem in the thumbnail below. Then I dig into the Biot-Savart formula and realize that according to the law of cosines
d^2=(\textbf{r-r´})^2=x^2+R^2-2xR\cos \theta \simeq x^2-2xR\cos \theta
And
d\textbf{l´}\times(\textbf{r-r´})=\sin (\pi/2-\varphi)dl d \hat{y}=\cos (\varphi)Rdd\theta \hat{y}
But now since the angle ##\phi \simeq 0 ## I see that
\cos \varphi \simeq \cos (\pi-\theta ) = -\cos \theta
So putting it all together
\textbf{B}(x)= \frac{\mu_0 I}{4 \pi} \oint_s \frac{Rd \theta \cos \varphi}{d^2}\hat{y}\simeq \frac{\mu_0 I}{4 \pi} \oint_s \frac{-R \cos \theta}{x^2-2Rx\cos \theta}\hat{y}d \theta=-\frac{\mu_0 I}{4 \pi} \frac{R}{x^2} \oint_s \frac{\cos \theta}{1-2R/x \cos \theta}\hat{y} d \theta
And since I don't know how to integrate this I don't even know if I'm right. That's my dilemma.
 

Attachments

  • Magnetic dipole.jpg
    Magnetic dipole.jpg
    16.5 KB · Views: 400
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, Order.

Order said:
But now since the angle ##\phi \simeq 0 ## I see that
\cos \varphi \simeq \cos (\pi-\theta ) = -\cos \theta

I think you went too far in this approximation when you approximated ##\phi## by zero. I made the same approximation at first, but kept getting the wrong answer by a factor of 2. Only when I went back and kept the first order approximation in ##\phi## did it all work out.

## -\frac{\mu_0 I}{4 \pi} \frac{R}{x^2} \oint_s \frac{\cos \theta}{1-2R/x \cos \theta}\hat{y} d \theta##

You can use the approximation ##1/(1-\epsilon) \approx 1+\epsilon## for small ##\epsilon## to simplify the integral.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Solved

TSny said:
I think you went too far in this approximation when you approximated ##\phi## by zero. I made the same approximation at first, but kept getting the wrong answer by a factor of 2. Only when I went back and kept the first order approximation in ##\phi## did it all work out.

Yes, obviously the cosine of the angle is dependent of ##\phi## to first order. I should have understood that. I got an estimation of ##\cos \varphi ## without making this assumption (##\phi=0##) but it was half a page of trigonometric calculations and approximations! (There must be an easier way.) I got it all right in the end (after 3 Days).

Anyway, the real reason I posted was because I did not understand the closed integral. I thought I would have to use Green's theorem or some other gadget to solve it :redface:. But now I am no longer afraid of them.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top