Cloud Altitude: Understanding the Height Range of Clouds

  • Thread starter Thread starter physea
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cloud Position
AI Thread Summary
Clouds are not confined to a specific height range from sea level, as their altitudes can vary significantly based on geographic location, particularly in polar regions where cloud heights tend to be lower. For example, cirrus clouds may appear at around 150 feet above ground level (AGL) in polar areas, while altocumulus clouds can be found as low as 40 feet AGL. The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) has shifted from rigid cloud height classifications to more flexible guidelines, acknowledging the dynamic nature of cloud formations. Cloud heights are typically reported as AGL, whereas aircraft report heights above sea level (ASL), necessitating corrections for accurate data publication. Observers are encouraged to consult authoritative resources for specific guidelines relevant to their country.
physea
Messages
211
Reaction score
3
<< Mentor Note -- poster has been reminded to do some reading on their own before asking simple questions at the PF >>

Are clouds mostly in a specific height range from sea level? If yes, what is that height?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
physea said:
Are clouds mostly in a specific height range from sea level? If yes, what is that height?
finish.jpg


While we are here to help, it would be more efficient (and respectful of our time) if you try googling your questions before posting them. Though not efficiently worded, copying and pasting your exact question into Google yielded me lots of great results.
 

Attachments

  • finish.jpg
    finish.jpg
    10.4 KB · Views: 3,211
It can't be hard to find that information online.
 
physea said:
Are clouds mostly in a specific height range from sea level? If yes, what is that height?
As a long time weather observer in polar climes, and an aviation weather qa specialist, i would add that the etages are not a fixed thing, per say. They do compress (lower) towards the poles. For example, you may find what looks like stereotypical CI (cirrus) at 150 AGL at the poles, or AC Lenticularis (Altocumulus that is sheared almond shape usually by terrain and high resulting wind) at levels as low as 040 AGL, which technically makes them SC (Stratocumulus) (rotor clouds?). We would just put a remark in if it doesn't fit in the computer ;) There is only one resource that is authoritative in your country, and it is written within the directive provided by WMO. In Canada. we use this: https://www.ec.gc.ca/manobs/73BC3152-E142-4AEE-AC7D-CF30DAFF9F70/MANOBS_7E-A19_Eng_web.pdf this is the latest edition to date and legal in Canada, but may be a good guide for you also (I don't know what Country you reside in). Very clear cut etages were given in the past, but WMO has moved away from this as of MANOBS 18. The etages (the old term for heights) used to be extremely rigid. Now they are considered a guideline, acknowledging that the clouds and etages are both variable dynamic things, not something that can be set in stone (anymore). -And just to add, cloud heights are generally given as height above ground level (AGL), not ASL (above sea level) unless you happen to be observing them actually at sea level. Aircraft will report heights ASL, but the observer has to apply a correction (if report was given over the station) before publishing. I suppose there are some places where the height is below sea level, but I have no experience with this. Hope this helps!
 
Thanks, I didn't know it would be so easy to find.

Something else that I searched but I couldn't find it:

1) How much
Cory Buott said:
As a long time weather observer in polar climes, and an aviation weather qa specialist, i would add that the etages are not a fixed thing, per say. They do compress (lower) towards the poles. For example, you may find what looks like stereotypical CI (cirrus) at 150 AGL at the poles, or AC Lenticularis (Altocumulus that is sheared almond shape usually by terrain and high resulting wind) at levels as low as 040 AGL, which technically makes them SC (Stratocumulus) (rotor clouds?). We would just put a remark in if it doesn't fit in the computer ;) There is only one resource that is authoritative in your country, and it is written within the directive provided by WMO. In Canada. we use this: https://www.ec.gc.ca/manobs/73BC3152-E142-4AEE-AC7D-CF30DAFF9F70/MANOBS_7E-A19_Eng_web.pdf this is the latest edition to date and legal in Canada, but may be a good guide for you also (I don't know what Country you reside in). Very clear cut etages were given in the past, but WMO has moved away from this as of MANOBS 18. The etages (the old term for heights) used to be extremely rigid. Now they are considered a guideline, acknowledging that the clouds and etages are both variable dynamic things, not something that can be set in stone (anymore). -And just to add, cloud heights are generally given as height above ground level (AGL), not ASL (above sea level) unless you happen to be observing them actually at sea level. Aircraft will report heights ASL, but the observer has to apply a correction (if report was given over the station) before publishing. I suppose there are some places where the height is below sea level, but I have no experience with this. Hope this helps!

Very insightful, thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes Cory Buott
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
Thread 'The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones'
(Edit: since the thread title was changed, this first sentence is too cryptic: the original title referred to a Tool song....) Besides being a favorite song by a favorite band, the thread title is a straightforward play on words. This summer, as a present to myself for being promoted, I purchased a collection of thin sections that I believe comprise the research materials of Prof. Rob Verschure, who at the time was faculty in the Geological Institute in Amsterdam. What changed this...

Similar threads

Back
Top