High Voltage in a Cloud Chamber?

In summary, a high school student is attempting to make a basic, dry ice cloud chamber and is seeking advice from other members on how to adapt an electrostatic field to their design. The electrostatic field is necessary to visualize the tracks of charged particles. There are different ways to create an electrostatic field, such as using a high voltage source and placing aluminum foil on the top and bottom of the chamber. The student is also considering adding an "ion scrubber" to their design, but there is limited information available on its effectiveness. It is suggested to first get the basic chamber working before adding any additional features.
  • #1
Jayssos
7
0
Hello all!

Firstly, thanks for reading this post!

I am a high school student attempting to make a basic, dry ice cloud chamber. I have made several cloud chamber designs and I am about to start making it. However, before constructing the product I would appreciate some members to provide answers to the silly questions I have.

One, it has recently come to my attention that an electrostatic field is required on top of the chamber to make tracks easier to visualise. However, after looking at several tutorials on cloud chambers I realized that not many put electrostatic fields on top of the chambers. Therefore, I am wondering how I could possibly adapt an electrostatic field to my designs?

Screenshots of my design (made on sketchup):
CC3 Screenshot #5.PNG
CC3 Screenshot #1.PNG
CC3 Screenshot #2.PNG
CC3 Screenshot #3.PNG
CC3 Screenshot #4.PNG


As visible in the images above, the cover for my cloud chamber is almost like a lid with some sort of a hinge, allowing it to open and close with being removed from the body of the chamber. There is a small hole in the side of the chamber for rubber stoppers that carry radioactive isotopes into the chamber (this is used in testing). The lid is preferably made of acrylic, with a simple rectangular (empty in the middle) strip of black felt stuck to the lids base. So there is still a visible area in the hole created by that black felt. Furthermore, the yellow lines next to the small hole are LED strips.

Question: How can I supply an electrostatic field to the top of my chamber (in this specific design) - feel free to criticize the design itself before answering my main question, I am open to suggestions.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Just as when you want a Fish dinner, first catch the fish.

For an electrstatic field, you need a high voltage DC supply of some sort, a few thousand volts. Some safe sources would be a small Whimhurst Machine or a small Van de Graf generator . They can be either built or purchased. Google them for details. Another possibility is a High Voltage DC power supply, NOT recommended due to safety considerations, they can actually kill you if grabbed at the wrong time or place.

Once you have a High Voltage source, put a piece of Aluminium foil or similar on the top and another piece on the bottom of the cloud chamber. Then connect the leads from the power source, one to each piece of foil.

What you gain for all this work is that the paths of any charged particles in the chamber, instead of being straight, will curve either upward or downward depending on their charge and the polarity at the top and bottom of the chamber.

Sounds like a fun project with or without the electrostatic field. Please keep us updated on the project.

Ohh, and HAVE FUN!
 
  • Like
Likes Jayssos
  • #3
Tom.G said:
Just as when you want a Fish dinner, first catch the fish.

For an electrstatic field, you need a high voltage DC supply of some sort, a few thousand volts. Some safe sources would be a small Whimhurst Machine or a small Van de Graf generator . They can be either built or purchased. Google them for details. Another possibility is a High Voltage DC power supply, NOT recommended due to safety considerations, they can actually kill you if grabbed at the wrong time or place.

Once you have a High Voltage source, put a piece of Aluminium foil or similar on the top and another piece on the bottom of the cloud chamber. Then connect the leads from the power source, one to each piece of foil.

What you gain for all this work is that the paths of any charged particles in the chamber, instead of being straight, will curve either upward or downward depending on their charge and the polarity at the top and bottom of the chamber.

Sounds like a fun project with or without the electrostatic field. Please keep us updated on the project.

Ohh, and HAVE FUN!
Thanks for the reply!

Okay, so it appears that an electrostatic field would allow the charged particles to curve upwards or downwards? I thought I saw something online about it acting as an "ion scrubber" or something. The curved tracks are interesting but what about the ion scrubber?
 
  • #4
Do you have a link to the "ion scrubber"? The only place I've seen that term used is as a sales pitch for electrostatic air cleaners.
 
  • #6
Hmmm, interesting. However there's not much information there. I wish he had shown before-and-after images of particle trails with and without the scrubber working. I also looked at another video that shows a "scrubber" of some sort. As shown, the scrubber structure isn't likely to show curved particle paths. The electrode spacing is rather large for the not-very-high voltage being used.

My overall suggetion would be get the basic chamber working and then decide if you want to add an "ion scrubber" and/or an overall electric field. You will probably learn more that way than you would by doing everything at once.

The videos did bring to mind an alternative though: Put the "ion scrubber" in the active area at the bottom of the chamber. This would greatly increase the particle path curvature since the electric field would be stronger between the closely spaced electrodes than the top-and-bottom electrode approach i suggested earlier. The top-and-bottom electrode spacing was assuming the whole chamber would be actively detecting and the availability of a higher voltage.
 
  • Like
Likes Jayssos
  • #7
Tom.G said:
Hmmm, interesting. However there's not much information there. I wish he had shown before-and-after images of particle trails with and without the scrubber working. I also looked at another video that shows a "scrubber" of some sort. As shown, the scrubber structure isn't likely to show curved particle paths. The electrode spacing is rather large for the not-very-high voltage being used.

My overall suggetion would be get the basic chamber working and then decide if you want to add an "ion scrubber" and/or an overall electric field. You will probably learn more that way than you would by doing everything at once.

The videos did bring to mind an alternative though: Put the "ion scrubber" in the active area at the bottom of the chamber. This would greatly increase the particle path curvature since the electric field would be stronger between the closely spaced electrodes than the top-and-bottom electrode approach i suggested earlier. The top-and-bottom electrode spacing was assuming the whole chamber would be actively detecting and the availability of a higher voltage.


Will continue to research this concept, but thanks for the suggestions! Once I have got it working I'll show you guys what its like!
 
  • #8
Tom.G said:
The top-and-bottom electrode spacing was assuming the whole chamber would be actively detecting and the availability of a higher voltage
A close spacing gives much better value for the available voltage. Why go for many kV when a few hundred V could do the job? I am thinking SAFETY in an educational environment.
 
  • #9
sophiecentaur said:
A close spacing gives much better value for the available voltage. Why go for many kV when a few hundred V could do the job? I am thinking SAFETY in an educational environment.

Hmm... I see your point. Perhaps I should start off without any electricity but as time progresses, add these suggestions to my designs.
 
  • #10
sophiecentaur said:
I am thinking SAFETY in an educational environment.
Yes! Thats why the suggestion of a Van de Graf or a Whimhurst in Post #2, they have such a tiny current, especially the smaller ones, that they are non-lethal. And they supply DC rather than AC, which is needed to show a curved particle path.

My father and I built an 18 inch tall Van de Graf when I was in high school. Great fun; just don't draw a spark to bare skin, it can give a pinpoint burn. Hold a key or other piece of metal in your hand to draw a spark. I've seen kits online for smaller (6 to 10 inches?) Van de Grafs that would be plenty large enough for the Cloud Chamber. The only functional drawback I can think of is with their tiny current they don't work worth a darn in high humidity.
 
  • #11
Tom.G said:
a Whimhurst in
Those things are deadly. Definitely not for the School Equipment list any more. The capacitors on a Wimshurst are much greater in value than the few pF of a Van der Graaf machine. They could easily give someone a heart attack - despite that, we used one on a door knob and gave a fellow pupil a big scare. (Mr Scales never got to hear about it, though)
Probably the safest and most controllable would be a 5kV lab supply with a nice fat 10M resistor in series. Some lab supplies have a switched internal resistor.
 
  • #12
Tom.G said:
Yes! Thats why the suggestion of a Van de Graf or a Whimhurst in Post #2, they have such a tiny current, especially the smaller ones, that they are non-lethal. And they supply DC rather than AC, which is needed to show a curved particle path.

My father and I built an 18 inch tall Van de Graf when I was in high school. Great fun; just don't draw a spark to bare skin, it can give a pinpoint burn. Hold a key or other piece of metal in your hand to draw a spark. I've seen kits online for smaller (6 to 10 inches?) Van de Grafs that would be plenty large enough for the Cloud Chamber. The only functional drawback I can think of is with their tiny current they don't work worth a darn in high humidity.
That's true. But I think
sophiecentaur said:
Those things are deadly. Definitely not for the School Equipment list any more. The capacitors on a Wimshurst are much greater in value than the few pF of a Van der Graaf machine. They could easily give someone a heart attack - despite that, we used one on a door knob and gave a fellow pupil a big scare. (Mr Scales never got to hear about it, though)
Probably the safest and most controllable would be a 5kV lab supply with a nice fat 10M resistor in series. Some lab supplies have a switched internal resistor.
Good idea! So I would need to build a circuit on my chamber I suppose?
 
  • #13
Jayssos said:
That's true. But I think

Good idea! So I would need to build a circuit on my chamber I suppose?
Does your College not already have one? If they have a supply of radioactive isotopes then they must have some reasonable facilities.
 
  • #14
sophiecentaur said:
Does your College not already have one? If they have a supply of radioactive isotopes then they must have some reasonable facilities.
It does, I'm just figuring out how I would apply the high voltage only to the cover of my chamber
 
  • #15
Jayssos said:
It does, I'm just figuring out how I would apply the high voltage only to the cover of my chamber
Not just to the cover. Between two plates, to produce a uniform up/down field, one on top and one underneath. And take care!
 
  • #16
I'm currently attempting a cloud chamber as well, and also wonder about the electrostatic part.

Could something like this unit be used? https://www.aliexpress.com/item/air...trage-5-0kv-dc-ionizer-density/768290803.html

While it supposedly generates 5kV, it only outputs 12uA max, so should be safe. I'm thinking hooking it up to a metal grid at the top of the chamber. If so I'd be getting the 12V variant so I don't have to fiddle with 230V.
 
  • #17
Lord Crc said:
I'm currently attempting a cloud chamber as well, and also wonder about the electrostatic part.

Could something like this unit be used? https://www.aliexpress.com/item/air...trage-5-0kv-dc-ionizer-density/768290803.html

While it supposedly generates 5kV, it only outputs 12uA max, so should be safe. I'm thinking hooking it up to a metal grid at the top of the chamber. If so I'd be getting the 12V variant so I don't have to fiddle with 230V.

Looks like a winner to me. Just don't grab it to "test" the safety!

If it does 'bite' you it will certainly get your attention but that's about all, the current is way too low for any real damage.
As an extra precaution, whenever working with it be sure the area behind you is clear. Since it is high voltage DC, there is a possibility that if you do get shocked some of your muscles will contract, and stay contracted until you are free of the voltage. With a clear area behind you, you can jump or fall back if you can't let go. (Saved me from screaming for help a few times. :redface:)
 
  • Like
Likes Lord Crc
  • #18
Tom.G said:
Looks like a winner to me.

Thanks, I ordered it and will report back my findings :)

Tom.G said:
Just don't grab it to "test" the safety!

This is what we have significant others for, right? "Hey honey, mind holding this for a second?" :biggrin:
 

What is a cloud chamber?

A cloud chamber is a device used to detect and visualize particles such as cosmic rays by creating a visible trail of condensation in a supersaturated gas.

How does high voltage affect a cloud chamber?

High voltage is used to create an electric field in the cloud chamber, which helps to accelerate and guide particles towards the detector. This allows for better detection and visualization of the particles.

Why is a high voltage necessary for a cloud chamber?

A high voltage is necessary to create a strong electric field in the cloud chamber, which is essential for detecting and visualizing particles. Without a high voltage, the particles may not be easily detectable or may not leave a visible trail in the chamber.

What is the ideal voltage for a cloud chamber?

The ideal voltage for a cloud chamber depends on various factors such as the type of particles being detected, the type of gas used, and the size of the chamber. Generally, a voltage range of 500-1000 volts is recommended for most cloud chambers.

Is working with high voltage in a cloud chamber dangerous?

Working with high voltage in a cloud chamber can be dangerous, as it involves the risk of electric shock. It is essential to take proper safety precautions and follow all safety protocols when handling high voltage equipment.

Similar threads

  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
3
Views
285
  • Mechanics
Replies
28
Views
24K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
9
Views
8K
Back
Top