CMB Flux Density: Deriving For Present Cosmology

In summary, the CMB flux density (W/m^2) can be found by using Planck's law and assuming a constant temperature of 2.725K. Unlike stars, the CMB is isotropic, so the energy absorbed per unit surface area is equal to the flux density without any need for additional calculations.
  • #1
Nabeshin
Science Advisor
2,207
16
Does anyone know where I can find numbers (or how to derive) the CMB flux density (W/m^2)? I'm only really interested in our present cosmological time, so a solution may assume the CMB to be at a constant temperature.
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
Nabeshin said:
Does anyone know where I can find numbers (or how to derive) the CMB flux density (W/m^2)? I'm only really interested in our present cosmological time, so a solution may assume the CMB to be at a constant temperature.
Well, the CMB is almost a perfect black body as T=2.725K. So you can compute it directly from the black body spectrum (Planck's Law):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_body#Planck.27s_law_of_black-body_radiation
 
  • #3
First, using Planck's law would give the energy radiated per unit surface area at that temperature, but that's per unit surface area of the radiating body, isn't it? In which case the surface area is... the entire universe?

What I'm interested in is if you have, say, a 1 m^2 surface, how much energy does it absorb from the cmb?

It's relatively easy to do this for a star or a single radiating black body, like a star, by computing total energy radiated and then spreading it evenly over a sphere of radius r. I don't really know how to extend this to the cmb though...
 
  • #4
Nabeshin said:
First, using Planck's law would give the energy radiated per unit surface area at that temperature,
Also the energy absorbed per unit surface area. This works for the CMB because it's isotropic (as opposed to the light from a star which only comes from a small area of the sky). So you don't multiply that value by any area to get the flux density of the CMB.
 
  • #5
So just [tex]A \sigma T^4[/tex] should work for total power absorbed, then? Interesting that it should turn out to be so simple!
 
  • #6
Nabeshin said:
So just [tex]A \sigma T^4[/tex] should work for total power absorbed, then? Interesting that it should turn out to be so simple!
Yup. Just bear in mind that "A" there would be dependent upon how you are doing the measurement, and would typically be the area of the beam of the detector on a telescope.
 

Related to CMB Flux Density: Deriving For Present Cosmology

What is CMB flux density?

CMB flux density, also known as cosmic microwave background flux density, is a measure of the amount of energy emitted by the cosmic microwave background radiation. It is usually expressed in units of watts per square meter per Hertz (W/m²/Hz).

How is CMB flux density derived?

CMB flux density is derived by analyzing the temperature and polarization of the cosmic microwave background radiation. This data is collected by telescopes and satellites, and then analyzed using mathematical models and equations to determine the flux density at different frequencies.

What does CMB flux density tell us about cosmology?

The CMB flux density is an important tool for understanding the early universe and the current state of cosmology. By studying the fluctuations in the CMB flux density, scientists can gain insights into the composition, geometry, and evolution of the universe.

How does CMB flux density vary across the electromagnetic spectrum?

CMB flux density has a relatively uniform distribution across the electromagnetic spectrum, with its peak at a wavelength of about 1.9 mm. However, it does show slight variations at different frequencies, which can provide valuable information about the properties of the universe.

What are the current challenges in deriving CMB flux density for present cosmology?

One of the main challenges in deriving CMB flux density for present cosmology is the presence of foreground noise, such as emissions from dust and gas in our galaxy. This noise must be carefully filtered out in order to accurately measure the CMB flux density. Additionally, technological advancements in telescopes and detectors are constantly being made to improve the precision and accuracy of CMB flux density measurements.

Similar threads

  • Cosmology
2
Replies
57
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
951
Replies
92
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top