CMB , Spherical Harmonics and Rotational Invariance

center o bass
Messages
545
Reaction score
2
In Dodelson's "Modern Cosmology" on p.241 he states that the ##a_{lm}##-s -- for a given ##l##-- corresponding to a spherical harmonic expansion of the photon-temperature fluctuations, are drawn from the same probability distribution regardless of the value of ##m##. Dodelson does not explain this any further, but other authors claim that it is due to the fact that ##m## somehow corresponds to an orientation and this should not matter as the universe is (believed to be) statistically rotational invariant.

Question:
What is the precise property of the spherical harmonic ##Y_l^m## for a given ##l## that justifies this claim?
 
Space news on Phys.org
That Y_l^m \sim e^{i m \phi}?
 
center o bass said:
Question:
What is the precise property of the spherical harmonic ##Y_l^m## for a given ##l## that justifies this claim?
The ##Y_\ell^m## functions for a given ##\ell## can be morphed into one another through rotations in any direction. That is, if you rotate the coordinate system, the resulting ##a_{\ell m}## parameters are a linear combination of the pre-rotated ##a_{\ell m}## parameters. During this rotation, only the ##a_{\ell m}## values with the same ##\ell## are mixed.
 
Chalnoth said:
The ##Y_\ell^m## functions for a given ##\ell## can be morphed into one another through rotations in any direction. That is, if you rotate the coordinate system, the resulting ##a_{\ell m}## parameters are a linear combination of the pre-rotated ##a_{\ell m}## parameters. During this rotation, only the ##a_{\ell m}## values with the same ##\ell## are mixed.
Thanks for the reply! From what you've now said, how would one go on to argue (fairly rigorously) that the ##a_{lm}##-s for a given ##l## must be drawn from the same probability distributions?
 
center o bass said:
Thanks for the reply! From what you've now said, how would one go on to argue (fairly rigorously) that the ##a_{lm}##-s for a given ##l## must be drawn from the same probability distributions?
That's the assumption of isotropy. As the different coefficients for the same ##\ell## are just rotations of one another, assuming isotropy requires that they all have the same probability distribution (provided you make use of the appropriate normalization for the ##Y_l^m## functions).
 
Back
Top