Coefficient of Friction Between Axe and Grindstone (Torque & MI)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the coefficient of friction between an axe and a rotating grindstone. A grindstone with a diameter of 0.510 meters and a mass of 50.0 kg is brought to rest from 900 rev/min in 7 seconds after applying a normal force of 160 N. Initial calculations for torque and angular acceleration were performed, but confusion arose regarding the correct units for angular acceleration, which should be in radians per second squared. The torque was calculated as -3.5 N, leading to an initial friction force of 13.7 N, but the coefficient of friction was incorrectly derived due to unit conversion errors. The correct approach involves using radians for angular acceleration to accurately determine the coefficient of friction.
Luis2101
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
A grindstone in the shape of a solid disk with diameter 0.510 and a mass of m= 50.0kg is rotating at w = 900rev/min. You press an ax against the rim with a normal force of N= 160N, and the grindstone comes to rest in 7.00sec.

Find the coefficient of friction between the ax and the grindstone. You can ignore friction in the bearings.

----
Simply put, I have no idea how to connect the information here to Coefficient of friction.
I have found Torque using t = I*(Angular Acceleration)
Where Moment of Inertia = 1/2 MR^2 = 1.63kg*m^2
And Angular Acceleration was found using w = w(initial) + angular acceleration*t.
I found the angular acceleration to be -2.14 rev/sec^2 (I converted the angular velocity to rev/sec in finding this).
And torque was equal to -3.5N...

I have all this info so far, but have no idea how to connect it to Coefficient of Friction, I thought maybe there would be some ratio with the Normal Force, but I don't have Friction Force so I'm pretty much stuck...

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

-L.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, the torque must be the radius times the frictional force..:smile:
 
That makes perfect sense...

But...
I solved for Friction using torque/radius or (3.5)/(.255) = 13.7N

I then tried to solve for the coefficient of friction using the relationship:
Friction = Mu*Normal Force
So 13.7/160 = 0.0856 for coefficient of friction... which is wrong.

Is that last relationship incorrect in this case?

-L.
 
Well, but you must use angular acceleration measured in radians per second per second in your standard torque equation.
This is where you've gone wrong; multiply your coefficient of friction with 2\pi to get the right value.
 
Ohhh I see...
I have to use radians for angular acceleration otherwise my Torque value is wrong.
Cool, thanks a lot man.

-L.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top