MHB Coefficient of Friction: Finding in a Factory

AI Thread Summary
In a factory scenario, a machine clamps a 4kg box with a total contact force of 100N from two identical clamps. To prevent the box from slipping, the minimum coefficient of friction required is calculated using the equation 40 = coefficient of friction × 100. This results in a coefficient of friction of 0.4. The discussion emphasizes the importance of a free body diagram in analyzing the forces involved. The calculations confirm that a coefficient of 0.4 is sufficient to keep the box secure.
Shah 72
MHB
Messages
274
Reaction score
0
In a factory, a machine picks up a box by clamping it on both sides. The box of mass 4kg is held clamped on both sides by identical clamps with the contacts horizontal. The machine provides a contact force of 50N with each clamp. Find the minimum coefficient of friction between each clamp and the box for the box not to slip.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
have you sketched a free body diagram?

In the vertical direction ...

\[ \sum f_{s \, max} = mg \]
 
skeeter said:
have you sketched a free body diagram?

In the vertical direction ...

\[ \sum f_{s \, max} = mg \]
Yeah I did that. 40=coefficient of friction ×(50+50).
Coefficient of friction =0.4
 
skeeter said:
have you sketched a free body diagram?

In the vertical direction ...

\[ \sum f_{s \, max} = mg \]
Thank you so much!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top