Coefficient of friction question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the initial speed of a car that skidded 290 meters with locked wheels, given a coefficient of friction (μ) of 0.6. The user correctly identifies the acceleration as a = μg, resulting in a value of 5.88 m/s², but initially neglects to apply the negative sign for deceleration. After clarification, it is established that the acceleration should be -5.88 m/s², leading to a positive initial speed calculation. The final conclusion confirms that the user correctly understood the need for the negative sign in the context of deceleration.
wtfcat
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If a car's wheels are locked during emergency braking, the car slides along the road. The record for the longest skid marks on a road was reportedly set in 1960. the marks were 290m long. assuming that \mu = 0.6, how fast was the car going when the wheels became locked?

Givens:
Vf = 0m/s
Vi = ?
d = 290m
a = ?
\mu = 0.6
g = 9.8m/s2

Formulas:
\SigmaF = ma
\muk = Fk/Fn
Vf2 = Vi2 + 2ad


Homework Equations



1. Am i missing anything? Givens, formulas, etc.
2. Are my steps correct? ex. in my steps, am i missing a positive or negative sign, did i get units right, etc
3. Is my answer correct?


The Attempt at a Solution



So in this case, \SigmaF = Fk, correct? And Fk = \mukmg, so ma = \mukmg, and cancelling out the m gives me a = \mukg. so a = (0.6)(9.8) = 5.88m/s2.
i sub "a" into the kinematic equation: Vf2 = Vi2 + 2ad ---> 0 = Vi2 + 2(5.88)(290) ---> -Vi2 = 3410.4 ---> -Vi = 58.3986m/s

If it's negative Vi, then does that mean that it was going backwards or something, or am i missing something here? Thanks in advance for taking the time to help me out! :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you did everything right except that your car is decelerating so your a value should really be -5.88 and that would give you a positive vi value.
 
oh, ok, got it =)
thank you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top