Coefficient of Kinetic Friction, Normal Force.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the coefficient of kinetic friction (\muk) for a box that stops after sliding on a rough surface. The user correctly identifies the known variables and uses the equation of motion to find acceleration, resulting in \muk = 0.0765. Clarification is provided that the relationship between acceleration and gravitational force allows for the calculation of \muk without needing the mass of the box. The normal force can be conceptualized per unit mass, simplifying the problem. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving similar physics problems effectively.
Laura EK
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"A box initially moving at 3.00m/s on a rough, level floor comes to a stop after sliding 6.00m. Find the coefficient of kinetic friction between the box and the floor."

Homework Equations


Fk=\mukFN
V2-V02 / 2x = a

The Attempt at a Solution



The first thing I did was write down all of the known variables:
x = 6.00m
V0x = 3.00m/s (initial)
Vx = 0m/s (final)

The next thing I did was draw a free body diagram, showing the weight (mg) pointing down, the fk pointing to the left (in the negative x direction), and Normal force (N) pointing up.

I found the acceleration by plugging given values into the second relevant equation:
02 - (3.00m/s)2 / 2 (6.00m) = -0.75m/s2

Then I found \muk by dividing the found acceleration (-0.75m/s2) by g (-9.8m/22) to come up with 0.0765 for \muk.

According to the solutions page, the answers are correct, but I have no idea why.
Why does a/g = \muk?

Also, if you are not given the mass of an object, how can you find the normal force of the object if N=mg?

Any and all feedback is appreciated. Thank you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, Laura.
Your answer looks good to me. I got .0765 but I used g=9.81.
The equation of motion is Ff = umg = ma so dividing by m gives you
u = a/g. Yes, you can't find the normal force mg but you can still do the problem! Think of it as finding the normal force per kg of mass - you are just doing each kg separately.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top