Coefficient of Kinetic Friction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a 5.20 kg block moving up an inclined plane. The change in kinetic energy was calculated as -154.154 J, and the change in potential energy was found to be 75.6 J. The frictional force acting on the block was determined to be 26.18 N. The coefficient of kinetic friction was initially miscalculated as 3.327 due to a calculator error, but it was clarified that the correct value is approximately 0.59 after correcting for radians. The conversation highlights the importance of ensuring calculator settings are accurate when performing physics calculations.
yb1013
Messages
55
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 5.20 kg block is set into motion up an inclined plane with an initial speed of v0 = 7.70 m/s. The block comes to rest after traveling 3.00 m along the plane, which is inclined at an angle of 30.0° to the horizontal.

(a) For this motion, determine the change in the block's kinetic energy.

I got -154.154 (correct)

(b) For this motion, determine the change in potential energy of the block-Earth system.

I got 75.6 (correct)

(c) Determine the frictional force exerted on the block (assumed to be constant).

I got 26.18 (correct)

(d) What is the coefficient of kinetic friction?

However, I could not figure this out for the life of me. Please help with the kinetic friction?

Homework Equations



I think the coeff. can be found with f=μmgCosθ , however my answer keeps coming out wrong...

The Attempt at a Solution



after using the previous formula, I came out with a value of μ=3.327 (26.18=u(5.2)(9.81)(cos(30))
 
Physics news on Phys.org
is the answer .59?
 
I don't understand how you get 3.327... coefficiant of friction isn't going to be more than 1

if you calculate what you have

(26.18=u(5.2)(9.81)(cos(30))

u get

26.18=44.13u

divide by 44.13
=.59
 
oooooo haha, thank you sir, my calculator somehow reverted itself back to radians?

Thanks again!
 
yb1013 said:
oooooo haha, thank you sir, my calculator somehow reverted itself back to radians?

Thanks again!

no prob. you did all the hard work haha
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top