Coherent States of the Harmonic Oscillator

tshafer
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Alright, I'm sure I'm missing something extremely simple, but in Griffiths (and another text I'm reading) coherent states are mentioned as eigenfunctions of the annihilation operator.

I just don't understand:
a) how you can have an eigenfunction of the annihilation operator (other than |0>) if the whole point is it knocks you down a level from |n> to |n-1>

b) why the creation operator is described as not having ay eigenfunctions if you can have eigenfunctions of the annihilation operator

any help would be great, thanks!
tom
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tshafer said:
a) how you can have an eigenfunction of the annihilation operator (other than |0>) if the whole point is it knocks you down a level from |n> to |n-1>

An individual |n\rangle state is obviously not an eigenstate (if n is not zero), but a linear combination of them can be. Define a state |\alpha\rangle as
|\alpha\rangle \equiv \sum_{n=0}^\infty{ \alpha^n\over\sqrt{n!}}|n\rangle
and act on it with the annihilation operator a; using a|n\rangle=\sqrt{n}|n{-}1\rangle, we get
a|\alpha\rangle <br /> = \sum_{n=0}^\infty{ \alpha^n\over\sqrt{n!}}\sqrt{n}|n{-}1\rangle<br /> = \sum_{n=1}^\infty{ \alpha^n\over\sqrt{(n{-}1)!}}|n{-}1\rangle.
Now replace n with n{+}1, and we have
a|\alpha\rangle<br /> = \sum_{n=0}^\infty{ \alpha^{n+1}\over\sqrt{n!}}|n\rangle<br /> = \alpha\sum_{n=0}^\infty{ \alpha^{n}\over\sqrt{n!}}|n\rangle<br /> = \alpha|\alpha\rangle.
tshafer said:
b) why the creation operator is described as not having any eigenfunctions if you can have eigenfunctions of the annihilation operator.

Well, the same trick doesn't work for the creation operator. Another way to do it is to work in the position basis, where a becomes something like x+d/dx (with various constants left out), and a^\dagger becomes something like x-d/dx. The first has an eigenfunction \exp[-(x-\alpha)^2/2] with eigenvalue \alpha, and the second has an eigenfunction \exp[+(x-\alpha)^2/2]. But this eigenfunction is not normalizable, so is not allowed.
 
Nice, that's a cute trick. I'll work through what you just said so I can get it for myself. Thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top