Coils arrangement so the hotplate operates at 3 diff. powers

  • Thread starter Thread starter moenste
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    coils
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the resistance and power dissipation of nichrome wire coils in an electric hotplate designed for a 250 V supply. The resistance of one coil is calculated to be approximately 78 Ω, leading to a power dissipation of around 797 W when connected to the supply. The arrangement of coils can be configured to achieve three different power settings, with calculations showing power ratings for series and parallel configurations. Additionally, the impact of a connecting cable with a resistance of 3.0 Ω on power loss is analyzed, indicating a loss of approximately 28 W during operation. The most suitable cable for the hotplate is identified as the one with the highest safe current rating to prevent overheating and potential hazards.
moenste
Messages
711
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement


A certain electric hotplate, designed to operate on a 250 V supply, has two coils of nichrome wire of resistivity 9.8 * 10-7 Ω m. Each coil consists of 16 m of wire of cross-sectional area 0.20 mm2.

(a) For one of the coils calculate (i) its resistance, (ii) the power dissipation when 250 V supply is connected across the coil, assuming its resistance does not change with temperature.

(b) Show, by means of diagrams, how these coils may be arranged so that the hotplate may be made to operate at three different powers. In each case, calculate the power rating.

(c) The hotplate is connected to the 250 V supply by means of cable of total resistance 3.0 Ω. (i) Calculate the power loss in the connecting cable when the hotplate is being used on its middle power rating. (ii) Comment qualitatively on any change in power loss in the cable when the hotplate is operating at each of its other power ratings.

(d) Different connecting cables are available for use with the hotplate. The maximum safe current which can be used in anyone of the cables is 1 A or 3 A or 6 A or 12 A. State which is the most appropriate cable to use and briefly explain one possible danger of using cable with a lower maximum safe current.

Answers: (a) (i) 78 Ω, (ii) 8 * 102 W, (c) (i) 28 W.

2. The attempt at a solution
(a) (i) ρ = (A R) / L → R = (ρ L) / A = (9.8 * 10 -7 * 16) / (2 * 10-7) = 78.4 Ω.

(a) (ii) P = V2 / R = 2502 / 78.4 = 797 W.

(b) Not even sure where to start. Am I required to make a circuit? What are coils in a circuit? Resistors? What is a hotplate in a circuit? A cell?

(c) (i) As I understand we'll have RTotal = RCoil + RCable = 78 Ω + 3 Ω = 81 Ω. Then P = 2502 / 81 = 771.6 W. Difference between 800 W and 771.6 W is 28.4 W.

(c) (ii) Not sure on this question either. So we need to say whether there will be any power losses in the cable when the hotplate is operating at what? What does "each of its other power ratings" actually mean?

(d) Maybe the higher is the maximum safe current the better it is? So in case more current starts going through the circuit the cables will not overheat and start buring? Just a guess, also not sure on this part.

Any suggestions please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
moenste said:
(b) Not even sure where to start. I need to make a circuit? What are coils in a circuit? Resistor? What is a hotplate in a circuit? A cell?
The coils act as resistors, right. The diagrams mentioned in the problem statement are circuit diagrams. The heating pad is irrelevant - just the electrical part matters.

moenste said:
(c) (i) As I understand we'll have RTotal = RCoil + RCable = 78 Ω + 3 Ω = 81 Ω. Then P = 2502 / 81 = 771.6 W. Difference between 800 W and 771.6 W is 28.4 W.
You need (b) here (e.g.: what about the other coil?), but you picked the right circuit. Why did you calculate the difference to 800 W? The coil cannot have 800 W, that would be more than the power in wire plus coil, and it would give a negative power loss in the cable.
Your answer is not far away from the right answer by accident here, but it is not right.
moenste said:
(c) (ii) Not sure on this question either. So we need to say whether there will be any power losses in the cable when the hotplate is operating at what? What does "each of its other power ratings" actually mean?
That needs an answer to (b). Depending on how you connect the coils, you get different heating power values.
moenste said:
(d) Maybe the higher is the maximum safe current the better it is? So in case more current starts going through the circuit the cables will not overheat and start buring? Just a gues, also not sure on this thing.
Well, the 12 A cable is fine, but more expensive than others. Can you also use cables rated for lower currents?
Overheating is indeed the issue if the current rating is too low.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
moenste said:
(b) Not even sure where to start. Am I required to make a circuit? What are coils in a circuit? Resistors? What is a hotplate in a circuit? A cell?
Yes, you're being asked to draw three configurations where one or more of the coils is being supplied power.

For purposes of this exercise the coils can be represented as resistors.[edit: I see that @mfb got there first]
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
mfb said:
You need (b) here, but you picked the right circuit by accident. Why did you calculate the difference to 800 W? The coil cannot have 800 W, that would be more than the power in wire plus coil.
Let's then finish (b) first.

mfb said:
The coils act as resistors, right. The diagrams mentioned in the problem statement are circuit diagrams.
gneill said:
Yes, you're being asked to draw three configurations where one or more of the coils is being supplied power.

For purposes of this exercise the coils can be represented as resistors.
Maybe it should be something like this:
82611fcc6c65.jpg
 
There is no circuit element "hotplate". A hotplate is just a metal disk with heating coils below (or inside). The interesting part as far as this problem is concerned is the two resistive coils. So your circuit diagrams should contain only power supply and resistors.

You need to determine how to apply voltage to the resistors to get three different power settings.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
gneill said:
You need to determine how to apply voltage to the resistors to get three different power settings.
I can only think of: (i) power supply in series with two resistors in series and (ii) power supply in series with two resistors that are in parallel.
 
moenste said:
I can only think of: (i) power supply in series with two resistors in series and (ii) power supply in series with two resistors that are in parallel.
Nowhere does it say that both coils have to be in use at the same time :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
gneill said:
Nowhere does it say that both coils have to be in use at the same time :wink:
Maybe then:
moenste said:
(i) power supply in series with two resistors in series and (ii) power supply in series with two resistors that are in parallel.
and (iii) power supply in series with just a one resistor.
 
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #10
gneill said:
Yes.
And this means
moenste said:
In each case, calculate the power rating.
that we need to calculate the power (like P = V I or P = V2 / R) for each of the graphs?
 
  • #11
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #12
gneill said:
Yes.
Then we would have:
  1. One resistor: P = 2502 / 78 = 801 W.
  2. Two resistors in series: P = 2502 / (78 + 78) = 401 W.
  3. Two parallel resistors: P = 2502 / 39 = 1603 W. (1 / R = 1 / 78 + 1 / 78 → R = 39 Ω.)
 
  • #13
Looks good.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #14
gneill said:
Looks good.
OK, so for the next part we have the middle power 801 W or (797 W if we use 78.4 Ω). So, roughly 800 W.

Then the power loss will be:
moenste said:
(c) (i) As I understand we'll have RTotal = RCoil + RCable = 78 Ω + 3 Ω = 81 Ω. Then P = 2502 / 81 = 771.6 W. Difference between 800 W and 771.6 W is 28.4 W.

What's wrong with this one?
 
  • #15
I don't see anything wrong, per se. Does it answer the question posed?
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #16
gneill said:
I don't see anything wrong, per se. Does it answer the question posed?
I would say it's correct, but:
mfb said:
You need (b) here (e.g.: what about the other coil?), but you picked the right circuit. Why did you calculate the difference to 800 W? The coil cannot have 800 W, that would be more than the power in wire plus coil, and it would give a negative power loss in the cable.
Your answer is not far away from the right answer by accident here, but it is not right.
Maybe @mfb meant that I got the right answer by accident withouth considering (b) first?
 
  • #17
I think it's a matter of interpretation as to what "power lost" means. Lost as compared to what benchmark?

If the cable was ideal (no resistance) then the single coil produces about 800 W of heat. What heat does that coil produce when the cable is not ideal but has a resistance of 3 Ohms? The difference between "ideal" and "not ideal" could be considered power lost.

On the other hand, you could simply calculate the power consumed by the cable directly under operating conditions and call that the power lost (since it doesn't contribute to heating up your soup).

I think that both approaches should lead to similar, but not identical answers. And I also suspect that the latter approach s what is intended in the question: find the power dissipated by the cable.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #18
gneill said:
I think it's a matter of interpretation as to what "power lost" means. Lost as compared to what benchmark?

If the cable was ideal (no resistance) then the single coil produces about 800 W of heat. What heat does that coil produce when the cable is not ideal but has a resistance of 3 Ohms? The difference between "ideal" and "not ideal" could be considered power lost.

On the other hand, you could simply calculate the power consumed by the cable directly under operating conditions and call that the power lost (since it doesn't contribute to heating up your soup).

I think that both approaches should lead to similar, but not identical answers. And I also suspect that the latter approach s what is intended in the question: find the power dissipated by the cable.
I did that actually. But P = 2502 / 3 = 20 833 W.

While if we do 2502 / (78 + 3) = 771.6 W. 800 - 771.6 = 28.4 W.
 
  • #19
moenste said:
I did that actually. But P = 2502 / 3 = 20 833 W.
But the 250 V is not directly across the cable resistance! It and the hotplate resistance are in series. Better to first find the current, then apply ##P = I^2 R## for the resistances in a series connection.
While if we do 2502 / (78 + 3) = 771.6 W. 800 - 771.6 = 28.4 W.
Yes, but then you need to justify the 800 W value (as I did in post #17). It's easier to just calculate the actual power lost during operation, as above.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #20
moenste said:
Calculate the power loss in the connecting cable when the hotplate is being used on its middle power rating.
I think the problem statement is unambiguous, it asks for the power dissipation in the cable. If it would ask about power differences in the hot plate, it would be "due to the connecting cable" or something like that.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste and gneill
  • #21
gneill said:
But the 250 V is not directly across the cable resistance! It and the hotplate resistance are in series. Better to first find the current, then apply ##P = I^2 R## for the resistances in a series connection.

Yes, but then you need to justify the 800 W value (as I did in post #17). It's easier to just calculate the actual power lost during operation, as above.
mfb said:
I think the problem statement is unambiguous, it asks for the power dissipation in the cable. If it would ask about power differences in the hot plate, it would be "due to the connecting cable" or something like that.
Hm, so: I = V / R = 250 / (78 + 3) = 3.086 A. P = I2 R = 3.0862 * 3 = 28.6 W. Should be correct now?
 
  • #22
Yes, that's fine.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #23
gneill said:
Yes, that's fine.
Alright, so (c) (ii) and (e) are left.

moenste said:
(ii) Comment qualitatively on any change in power loss in the cable when the hotplate is operating at each of its other power ratings.
What does this actually mean?

If we have two resistors in series I would say that the power loss is larger (more cable is used). And when they are connected in parallel less power is lost, but still more than when there is one resistor. Like this?

moenste said:
(d) Different connecting cables are available for use with the hotplate. The maximum safe current which can be used in anyone of the cables is 1 A or 3 A or 6 A or 12 A. State which is the most appropriate cable to use and briefly explain one possible danger of using cable with a lower maximum safe current.
Maybe the higher is the maximum safe current the better it is? So in case more current starts going through the circuit the cables will not overheat and start buring? Just a guess, also not sure on this part.
 
  • #24
moenste said:
What does this actually mean?

If we have two resistors in series I would say that the power loss is larger (more cable is used). And when they are connected in parallel less power is lost, but still more than when there is one resistor. Like this?
You should consider the length of the cable to be fixed. The interconnections and switching of the coils would be handled inside the hotplate package, while the cable would be like an extension cord that plugs into an electric outlet. The cable length doesn't change when you turn a switch on the hotplate.

You could calculate the power loss for each case and compare the amounts as well as compare the lost amount to the "delivered" amount in each case. It's up to you to think of what points might be of interest since they invite you to "Comment qualitatively", but you might get extra credit if you can put it in terms of "energy efficiency".
Maybe the higher is the maximum safe current the better it is? So in case more current starts going through the circuit the cables will not overheat and start buring? Just a guess, also not sure on this part.
Well, it's definitely not a good idea if using an appliance creates a fire hazard :smile: Can the thinnest cable offered operate the hotplate safely on all three settings? What do think an appropriate safety margin might be for cable rating versus actual maximum current?
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
  • #25
gneill said:
You should consider the length of the cable to be fixed. The interconnections and switching of the coils would be handled inside the hotplate package, while the cable would be like an extension cord that plugs into an electric outlet. The cable length doesn't change when you turn a switch on the hotplate.

You could calculate the power loss for each case and compare the amounts as well as compare the lost amount to the "delivered" amount in each case. It's up to you to think of what points might be of interest since they invite you to "Comment qualitatively", but you might get extra credit if you can put it in terms of "energy efficiency".
Energy losses with one resistor and cable: 28.6 W.

Energy losses with two resistors and cable: I = 250 / (78 + 78 + 3) = 1.57 A → P = 1.572 * 3 = 7.4 W.

Energy losses with two parallel resistors and cable: I = 250 / (39 + 3) = 5.95 A → P = 5.952 * 3 = 106.3 W.

So if I got the parallel one correct (calculated the resistance of the resistors first and then added the cable resistor) the most efficient way would be to put two resistors in series and the least efficient way would be putting them in parallel.

gneill said:
Well, it's definitely not a good idea if using an appliance creates a fire hazard :smile: Can the thinnest cable offered operate the hotplate safely on all three settings? What do think an appropriate safety margin might be for cable rating versus actual maximum current?
Well, our currents are: 3.08 A, 1.57 A and 5.95 A for the three settings, if I calculated them correctly.

The most appropriate would be the 6 A cable in order to use it for the three settings. 12 A cable would be more expensive. The danger of using a cable with a lower current is the risk of fire.

Though I don't know how to calculate a safety margin.
 
  • #26
Okay, that's all good stuff. As expected the largest power loss occurs at the highest power setting on the hotplate, and it amounts to the equivalent of a running a bright lightbulb (100 W).

For real cables I'd expect their resistance to go down as their current ratings go up, so there could be ongoing power savings that offset the initial cost of a better cable. But since we're not given any data about this to work with it can only be mentioned and not demonstrated.

Safety margins are generally rule-of-thumb standards that evolved from experience in various trades. A 50% margin is reasonable for many things. It's not uncommon to build things to withstand two or even three times the expected characteristics (so 100% or 200% margin), particularly where public safety is involved. Thus you won't find a single cookbook formula for safety margin, but rather several cookbooks for different disciplines. Also, when you buy a commercially sold product with a given rating it's probably got its own built-in safety factor in that number! Maybe it's not worth getting into for this problem.

I think that for purposes of this problem they probably want to make sure that you pick a cable that will handle the highest power setting on the hotplate. Just mention that the highest power setting on the hotplate is awfully close to the maximum rating of the 6 A cable, and for matters of safety and working life of the materials it would be prudent to go to the next higher rated cable.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste and mfb
Back
Top