Coin rolling with constant deceleration, how much time to go 1.6m

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the time a coin rolls before falling off a table, given its initial and final angular velocities and the distance traveled. The initial angular velocity is 3.4 rad/s, and it decelerates to 1.2 rad/s over a distance of 1.6m. A key point is the need to convert the number of rotations into radians for accurate calculations. The attempted solution incorrectly used the number of rotations instead of the angular displacement in radians. The correct approach involves using the formula for angular displacement to find the time taken for the coin to roll off the table.
IAmPat
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A coin is rolled without slipping on a table top in a straight line. It starts rolling at 3.4 rad/s and slows down at a constant angular acceleration. It is rolling at 1.2 rad/s when it falls off the table edge. If the radius of the coin is 0.011m, and the edge of the table is 1.6m from where the coin started, for how much time did the coin roll?

Homework Equations



Wi = 3.4rad/s
Wf = 1.2rad/s
\DeltaX = 1.6m
radius = 0.011m

\theta = \frac{1}{2}(Wf + Wi)* t
Wf = Wi) + \alpha*t



The Attempt at a Solution




2*pi* r = 0.691
1.6m / 0.691 = 23.15 full rotations

23.15 = 1/2 (Wf + Wi)*t
23.15 = 1/2 (1.2 + 3.4)*t
...
t = 10.07sec

That didn't work. I assume it has something to do with calculating how many rotations, or the actual angle displacement.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, it looks like you calculated your number of rotations right, but I noticed you plugged that directly into your equation. The value theta represents the radians that are displaced, not the number of revolutions. You first need to convert your revolutions to radians and then use that value for theta.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top