Cold Fusion Questions: Answers to Common Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wyman91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cold Fusion
AI Thread Summary
Cold fusion is largely regarded by physicists as non-existent due to the fundamental challenges of overcoming nuclear repulsion, which requires extremely high temperatures to achieve fusion. The discussion highlights that successful fusion relies on conditions that create plasma, where nuclei can overcome their positive charge repulsion. Current fusion research focuses on methods like magnetic and inertial confinement, rather than cold fusion. Future fusion reactors will need to address material resilience against neutron bombardment and thermal stress, with ongoing experiments exploring solutions like using liquid lithium to manage neutron interactions. Overall, the consensus is to prioritize established fusion research over cold fusion inquiries.
Wyman91
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I am very ignorant on this subject and was just wondering a few things.

What exactly is it (how do they do it), I am having trouble finding information on it.

Why can't it be recreated, or was it really done at all?

Also I was wondering what resources it uses to create the energy.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wyman91 said:
I am very ignorant on this subject and was just wondering a few things.

What exactly is it (how do they do it), I am having trouble finding information on it.

Why can't it be recreated, or was it really done at all?

Wyman,

It's the consensus of physicists that it really doesn't exist.

That's why it can't be recreated. Think about it. In order to get
fusion, one has to get the nuclei of the atoms very close in order for
the strong nuclear force - which is short range - to take hold and fuse
the nuclei together and release energy.

However, the nuclei are both positively charged - and like charges
repel. In order to get the nuclei close enough with the electric repulsion
trying to push them apart all the way - the nuclei have to be traveling
fast enough so that they can overcome this repulsion.

If the nuclei are moving fast enough to overcome this repulsion - then
the material is hot - because that's what heat is - fast moving atoms.
The temperatures that are high enough for the nuclei to overcome this
electric repulsion are in the millions of degrees. The material is in a
state of matter called a "plasma".

I'd forget about research "cold fusion", and learn about real fusion
research - both magnetic confinement as pursued at the Princeton
Plasma Physics Laboratory, or inertial confinement as pursued at
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, the University of Rochester,
and other sites:

http://www.pppl.gov/

http://www.llnl.gov/nif/

http://www.llnl.gov/nif/icf/icf.html

http://www.lle.rochester.edu/

http://www.sandia.gov/capabilities/pulsed-power/facilities/saturn.html

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist
 
Last edited:
Thank you very much for your information and suggestions.


"The successful operation of a fusion power plant will require the use of materials resistant to energetic neutron bombardment, thermal stress, and magnetic forces." http://www.pppl.gov/fusion_basics/pages/fusion_power_plant.html

What materials are they using now, and what materials could they use?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wyman91 said:
Thank you very much for your information and suggestions.


"The successful operation of a fusion power plant will require the use of materials resistant to energetic neutron bombardment, thermal stress, and magnetic forces." http://www.pppl.gov/fusion_basics/pages/fusion_power_plant.html

What materials are they using now, and what materials could they use?

Wyman,

Right now the materials used are not important.

The fusion experiments that PPPL does / has done - do result in the
release of energetic neutrons - but only for a short period of time.

Therefore, the test reactor isn't damaged by the neutrons - they don't
bombard the structure of the test reactor long enough to cause
significant damage.

They are just saying that, in the future, when fusion power reactors are
in existence - they will operate continuously - and thus sufficient
neutron bombardment may damage reactor materials.

This will have to be taken care of in the design of the future fusion
reactor. For example, if energetic neutrons are a problem - for example
the Deuterium-Tritium reaction releases 14.1 MeV neutrons - then some
way needs to be engineered to deal with these high energy neutrons.

Probably what one would do is to use some light isotope - like the
hydrogen in water, or lithium to slow the neutrons down so that they
are slow neutrons. Slow neutrons are more easily absorbed by such
materials as cadmium and boron.

Slowing the neutrons down is also how one would extract the fusion
energy which is mostly in the neutrons with a D-T fusion reaction.

One way of doing this is by using a "wall" of liquid lithium as scientists
at Princeton are experimenting with:

http://www.pppl.gov/publications/pics/info_bull_cdxu_0703.pdf .

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top