Collection of Lame Jokes

  • Thread starter Thread starter quddusaliquddus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jokes
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread centers around sharing and enjoying lame jokes, with participants contributing various humorous quips and puns. The discussion explores the nature of humor, particularly focusing on jokes that are intentionally corny or groan-inducing.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants share their favorite lame jokes, such as the classic "Why did the chicken cross the road?" and variations on animal-related humor.
  • Others express differing opinions on the quality of certain jokes, with some finding them hilarious while others consider them unfunny or "lame." For example, one participant finds a specific horse joke funny, while another insists it doesn't qualify as lame.
  • A few jokes incorporate wordplay and puns, such as the "frayed knot" joke and the "super calloused fragile mystic hexed by halitosis" joke, which elicit mixed reactions.
  • There are discussions about surreal humor, with some participants questioning the nature of certain jokes and their classification as humor, such as the "fish" response to a lightbulb question.
  • Participants also engage in playful banter about the quality of jokes and the nature of humor itself, with some joking about the reactions to their contributions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no clear consensus on what constitutes a "lame" joke, as participants express a range of opinions on the humor shared. Some jokes are appreciated by certain individuals while others find them lacking, indicating a diversity of taste in humor.

Contextual Notes

Some jokes rely on specific cultural references or wordplay that may not be universally understood, leading to varied interpretations among participants.

  • #6,841
I saw a report on TV this morning that a cop in Wisconsin stopped the Oscar Mayer wienermobile for a traffic violation. First he had to ketchup with the vehicle, then he grilled the driver.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: davenn, 256bits, WWGD and 3 others
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #6,842
jtbell said:
I saw a report on TV this morning that a cop in Wisconsin stopped the Oscar Mayer wienermobile for a traffic violation. First he had to ketchup with the vehicle, then he grilled the driver.
And then when the driver started talking back disrespectfully to the cop, he got another ticket for being a brat.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Keith_McClary, 256bits and BillTre
  • #6,843
jtbell said:
I saw a report on TV this morning that a cop in Wisconsin stopped the Oscar Mayer wienermobile for a traffic violation. First he had to ketchup with the vehicle, then he grilled the driver.
I relish that joke.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Keith_McClary, Borg, 256bits and 1 other person
  • #6,844
DrClaude said:
I relish that joke.
I’m glad it cuts the mustard. :cool:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Keith_McClary, Borg, 256bits and 1 other person
  • #6,845
A gorilla was walking through the jungle when he saw a lion taking a drink from a lake. The lion had its back turned and was oblivious to everything except the water, so the gorilla snuck up behind and kicked the lion into the lake. Needless to say, the lion was not happy, and the gorilla took off into the jungle with the lion in hot pursuit. Soon the gorilla came to an abandoned human camp. Quick as a flash, he grabbed khakis and a pith helmet, put them on, sat down in a chair, grabbed a newspaper and hid his hairy face behind it, pretending to read.

The lion charged into the encampment a moment later. "Excuse me sir," he said, "but have you seen a gorilla come through here?"

"What," answered the gorilla, without lowering his newspaper. "You mean the gorilla who pushed the lion into the lake?"

"My goodness!" exclaimed the lion. "It's in the papers already?"
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Keith_McClary, DaveC426913, 256bits and 2 others
  • #6,846
When asked, first half of students liked abstract Mathematics, Second half liked applied Mathematics. Third half never studied Mathematics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jack action
  • #6,847
WWGD said:
When asked, first half of students liked abstract Mathematics, Second half liked applied Mathematics. Third half never studied Mathematics.
No problem in ##\mathbb{Z}_3\, : \,\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}=0## so nobody has been asked..
 
  • #6,848
fresh_42 said:
No problem in ##\mathbb{Z}_3\, : \,\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}=0## so nobody has been asked..
If nobody has been asked then we don't need finite fields. We got all three answers 0/2 = 0 times.
 
  • #6,849
mfb said:
If nobody has been asked then we don't need finite fields. We got all three answers 0/2 = 0 times.
Maybe we need another. ##\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}=\frac{1}{4}##. Now what about the other three quarters?
 
  • #6,850
fresh_42 said:
Maybe we need another. ##\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}=\frac{1}{4}##. Now what about the other three quarters?
3 quarters is 75 cents, figure out your Math!
 
  • #6,851
WWGD said:
3 quarters is 75 cents, figure out your Math!
But if ##\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{4}=0## then that makes no cents.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix
  • #6,852
jbriggs444 said:
But if ##\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{4}=0## then that makes no cents.
If I had a dollar for every time I'd heard that...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444
  • #6,853
jbriggs444 said:
But if ##\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{4}=0## then that makes no cents.
##\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{4}=\frac{1}{3}##. Someone has to solve this inflation problem.
 
  • #6,854
Can one of you post a wiki link (or similar) to whichever branch of mathematics you're talking about? I'm a little out of my depth here.
 
  • #6,855
Ibix said:
Can one of you post a wiki link (or similar) to whichever branch of mathematics you're talking about? I'm a little out of my depth here.
I am a bit out of depth also, but I believe that it is the finite field of three elements that is being discussed. So the elements could be referred to as {0, 1, 2}. "4" would be an alias for 1. ##\frac{1}{4}=\frac{1}{1}=1##. And 1+1+1 = 0.

Edit: However, this theory does not square with a claim that ##\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{4}=\frac{1}{3}## because that would involve a division by zero. By the same logic, a finite field of four elements is also ruled out. That leaves the possibility of the finite field of five elements. In that field ##\frac{1}{4}=4##, ##4+4+4=2## and ##\frac{1}{3}=2##. So that one sounds like a winner. Plus no need to make "4" an alias.

Edit2: ##\frac{1}{4}=4## since ##4 \times 4 = 16 = 1##. Similarly ##\frac{1}{3}=2## since ##3 \times 2 = 6 = 1##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix
  • #6,856
Ibix said:
Can one of you post a wiki link (or similar) to whichever branch of mathematics you're talking about? I'm a little out of my depth here.
Presumably, ## \frac {1}{4} ## is the multiplicative inverse of ##4## in the field with ##3## elements, i.e., the number ##x## with ##4x=1## (this x exists for all non-zero elements, by definition/construction). But in ## \mathbb Z_3 = \{[0],[1],[2]\}## , the field with ##3 ## elements, ##1=4=7=10=...; 2=5=8=11=... ; 0=3=6=...## ( These are classes of elements rather than just elements; you collapse each of 1=4=7=... into a single class and your elements are now classes ), so you get ## 1/4+1/4+ 1/4 =1 +1+1 =3=0 ## ( in a field with p elements, any multiple of p is the same as zero) . Hope I explained it well. This is theory of Fields, Rings in Abstract Algebra. Please ask any followup, followed by a bad joke if possible ( i.e., model any of mine ;) ).
 
Last edited:
  • #6,857
jbriggs444 said:
But if ##\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{4}=0## then that makes no cents.
I will get paid in a different class representative, say 300,000.
 
  • #6,858
A physicist, a biologist and a mathematician are sitting in a street café watching people entering and leaving the house on the other side of the street.

First they see two people entering the house. Time passes. After a while they notice three people leaving the house.

The physicist says, "The measurement wasn't accurate."
The biologist says, "They must have reproduced."
The mathematician says, "If one more person enters the house then it will be empty."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jack action
  • #6,859
jbriggs444 said:
But if ##\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{4}+\frac{1}{4}=0## then that makes no cents.
Yeah, we really need another subforum in the Mathematics section: "Nonsensicus Absolutus".
 
  • #6,860
strangerep said:
Yeah, we really need another subforum in the Mathematics section: "Nonsensicus Absolutus".
You mean a nerd corner in the nerd lounge of nerdy general discussions?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444
  • #6,861
fresh_42 said:
You mean a nerd corner in the nerd lounge of nerdy general discussions?
Why a corner in a lounge? I've yet to encounter a pure mathematician who's not like that. :oldtongue:
 
  • #6,862
strangerep said:
Why a corner in a lounge? I've yet to encounter a pure mathematician who's not like that. :oldtongue:
We all fit in in the corner of a circular lounge. I have no idea what it means but it somehow sounds deep.
 
  • #6,863
mfb said:
Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial
Their reference #1: Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials (Smith & Pell) is worth a look:
The parachute and the healthy cohort effect

One of the major weaknesses of observational data is the possibility of bias, including selection bias and reporting bias, which can be obviated largely by using randomised controlled trials. The relevance to parachute use is that individuals jumping from aircraft without the help of a parachute are likely to have a high prevalence of pre-existing psychiatric morbidity. Individuals who use parachutes are likely to have less psychiatric morbidity and may also differ in key demographic factors, such as income and cigarette use. It follows, therefore, that the apparent protective effect of parachutes may be merely an example of the “healthy cohort” effect. Observational studies typically use multivariate analytical approaches, using maximum likelihood based modelling methods to try to adjust estimates of relative risk for these biases. Distasteful as these statistical adjustments are for the cognoscenti of evidence based medicine, no such analyses exist for assessing the presumed effects of the parachute.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: WWGD and mfb
  • #6,864
Word for the Day:
Excaligator:

Screen Shot 2020-01-31 at 2.46.31 PM.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: jtbell, Borg, mfb and 3 others
  • #6,865
BillTre said:
Word for the Day:
Excaligator:

View attachment 256404
Hmm...What do I make out of someone calling me 'Pialidotous'?
 
  • #6,866
WWGD said:
Hmm...What do I make out of someone calling me 'Pialidotous'?
Soup, a cauli, fridge, elastic and eggs?
 
  • #6,867
WWGD said:
Hmm...What do I make out of someone calling me 'Pialidotous'?
If it is a she, call her pistantrophobe, if it is a he, just say "Gesundheit!"
 
  • #6,868
fresh_42 said:
If it is a she, call her pistantrophobe, if it is a he, just say "Gesundheit!"
But I am also a(n) 'pert.
 
  • #6,869
You mean im-pert-inent? :smile:
 
  • #6,870
fresh_42 said:
You mean im-pert-inent? :smile:
I'm in the Impert/Expert business...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 470 ·
16
Replies
470
Views
36K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
979
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 420 ·
15
Replies
420
Views
43K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K