Collection of Science Jokes P2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jokes Science
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a collection of science-related jokes and humorous anecdotes shared among forum members. A notable joke features a mathematician with a dog and a cow who are claimed to be knot theorists, leading to a playful exchange with a bartender. Other jokes include puns related to physics, such as Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and light-hearted takes on mathematical concepts. The conversation also touches on the nature of humor in science, with members explaining the nuances of certain jokes, particularly those involving mathematical notation. Additionally, there are references to classic jokes that have circulated over the years, illustrating how humor can bridge complex scientific ideas with everyday life. Overall, the thread highlights the community's appreciation for clever wordplay and the joy of sharing science humor.
  • #3,551
dextercioby said:
Funny, I was just about to post this myself, lol.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3,553
1724474107536.png
 
  • Like
  • Care
  • Wow
Likes mfb, Wrichik Basu, collinsmark and 2 others
  • #3,554
Orodruin said:
So much so, in fact, that it's been the leading cause of pipe corrosion ever since it got into our water system.
 
  • #3,556
Orodruin said:
Inhaling even small amounts of it can lead to choking, lung damage and even death.
 
  • #3,558
1724688555341.png
 
  • Like
Likes dwarde and gmax137
  • #3,559
Screenshot 2024-08-28 at 6.22.21 AM.png
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and dwarde
  • #3,560
Screenshot 2024-08-28 at 6.19.57 AM.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes davenn, dwarde, gmax137 and 1 other person
  • #3,561
ADMINISTRATIUM
The heaviest element known to science was recently discovered. The element, tentatively named Administratium, has no protons or electrons and thus has an atomic number of 0. However it does have 1 Neutron, 128 Assistant Neutrons, 75 Vice-Neutrons and 111 Assistant Vice-Neutrons. This gives it an atomic weight of 315. These 315 particles are held together in a nucleus by a force that involves the continuous exchange of meson-like particles called Morons.

Since it has no electrons, Administratium, is inert. However, it can be detected chemically as it impedes every other reaction with which it comes into contact. According to the discoverers, a minute amount of Administratium caused one reaction to take over four days to complete, when it would normally occur in less than one second.
Administratium has a normal life of approximately 3 years, at which time it does not decay but, instead, undergoes a reorganisation in which Assistant Neutrons, Vice-Neutrons and Assistant Vice-Neutrons exchange places. Some studies have shown that the atomic weight actually increases after each reorganisation.

Research at other laboratories indicates that Administratium occurs naturally in the atmosphere. It tends to concentrate at certain points such as government, large companies, health facilities and universities; and will often be found in the newest, best maintained buildings.
Scientists point out that Administratium is known to be toxic at any level of concentration and can easily destroy any productive reactions where it is allowed to accumulate. Attempts are being made to determine how Administratium can be controlled to prevent irreversible damage, but results to date are not promising.

Unobtainium,
n. A substance having the exact high test properties required for a piece of hardware or other item of use, but not obtainable either because it theoretically cannot exist or because technology is insufficiently advanced to produce it. Humorous or ironical.

Listed in "Interim Glossary, Aero-Space Terms," as compiled by Woodford Heflin and published in February 1958 by the Air University of the US Air Force.
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude, Bystander, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #3,563
Screenshot 2024-08-31 at 8.30.53 AM.png
 
  • Haha
  • Wow
  • Like
Likes Borg, collinsmark, dwarde and 1 other person
  • #3,566
Orodruin said:
But which option did he pick?
E to match his grades in school?
 
  • #3,567
dextercioby said:
1725270421443.png

Maybe about 39% of the audience didn't know the answer either, if we assume they guessed randomly (i.e. 10% randomly chose the correct answer)!

(Or maybe some audience members deliberately chose the wrong answer, for a laugh.)
 
  • #3,569
Insipred by the recently closed "death ray" thread:

deathray.jpg
 
  • #3,570
berkeman said:
Well, those born after that picture was taken aren't in that picture yet - but ostensibly most of their atoms were.
 
  • #3,571
Screenshot 2024-09-11 at 7.29.19 AM.png
 
  • #3,572
1726102502441.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes dwarde, Filip Larsen, Borg and 3 others
  • #3,574
fresh_42 said:
Subtle. I like that.
134.6??
 
  • #3,575
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913 and pinball1970
  • #3,576
jack action said:
answers-jpg.jpg
I am confused.

This seems to be saying that scientists' girlfriends give simple answers that are false, but scientists prefer girls who give complicated answers that are true?

Or if I'm misreading this, what is the connection between the images and the text?

This isn't a joke answer, I am genuinely confused.
 
  • #3,577
DrGreg said:
I am confused.

This seems to be saying that scientists' girlfriends give simple answers that are false, but scientists prefer girls who give complicated answers that are true?

Or if I'm misreading this, what is the connection between the images and the text?

This isn't a joke answer, I am genuinely confused.
It seems quite Freudian but I am not sure.

Normal people end up with a woman that gives him grief but she's right.
He would prefer the hot chick but greener grass has no substance.

Scientists are attracted to smarter women.

Conspiracy people like conspiracies, complicated so they must be true even though they are nonsense.
 
  • #3,578
pinball1970 said:
134.6??
Celcius measured the other way around. 100° freezing, 0° boiling and 57=100-43.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #3,579
DrGreg said:
I am confused.

This seems to be saying that scientists' girlfriends give simple answers that are false, but scientists prefer girls who give complicated answers that are true?

Or if I'm misreading this, what is the connection between the images and the text?

This isn't a joke answer, I am genuinely confused.
It's complicated, is this about women preference or answers to the universe?
Both scenarios are a mystery to me.
 
  • #3,580
DrGreg said:
I am confused.
I think the scene is supposed to be read as "guy is with girl in blue but would dump her in an instant for the girl in red", so you're meant to read "[label on guy] will settle for [label on girlfriend] because they're available, but really desire [label on woman in red]". I think that kind of works for all three label sets.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre, phinds, DrGreg and 1 other person
  • #3,581
Ibix said:
I think the scene is supposed to be read as "guy is with girl in blue but would dump her in an instant for the girl in red", so you're meant to read "[label on guy] will settle for [label on girlfriend] because they're available, but really desire [label on woman in red]". I think that kind of works for all three label sets.
The scientist one threw me, why would he be with a dumb girl? She is not dumb, it is just that she is not in his 0.1%.
 
  • #3,582
jack action said:
I'm forwarding this to the team, two guys and 13 gals. I will feed back!
 
  • #3,583
You guys do realize it's the same girl, right?

Jus' stirring the pot here.
 
  • #3,584
DrGreg said:
I am confused.
This is a spin-off of a well-known meme called Distracted boyfriend:
The image was uploaded to Shutterstock with the caption: "Disloyal man walking with his girlfriend and looking amazed at another seductive girl".
The memes use this image with the following narrative: The subject [boyfriend] is distracted from his current interest or business [girlfriend] by something more exciting or alluring [seductive girl].
  • Most people when they are with complicated answers that are true are easily distracted by simple answers that are false;
  • Scientists when they are with simple answers that are false are easily distracted by complicated answers that are true;
  • Conspiracy theorists when they are with simple answers that are true are easily distracted by complicated answers that are false.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix, Borg, gmax137 and 2 others
  • #3,585
Screenshot 2024-09-18 at 7.37.24 AM.png
 
  • Like
Likes Hornbein, dwarde and phinds
  • #3,586
459952068_507102852062366_1812006939950845700_n.jpg
 
  • Haha
  • Love
Likes dextercioby, nuuskur and jack action
  • #3,587
Nothing makes a man a math wizard faster than when he sees his ex with a baby.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes dwarde, BillTre and phinds
  • #3,588
1726765869738.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes pinball1970, collinsmark, Ibix and 4 others
  • #3,589
Dinosaur stand up artists are something else..
dadjoke.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes pinball1970, Ibix, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #3,590
Screenshot 2024-09-21 at 4.45.55 AM.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Likes pinball1970, dextercioby, nuuskur and 5 others
  • #3,592
checkmate you filthy globers!
1727270441259.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes BillTre, pinball1970, DaveC426913 and 1 other person
  • #3,593
  • #3,594
DrGreg said:
I am confused.

This seems to be saying that scientists' girlfriends give simple answers that are false, but scientists prefer girls who give complicated answers that are true?

Or if I'm misreading this, what is the connection between the images and the text?

This isn't a joke answer, I am genuinely confused.
OK, a couple of things:

This is a standard meme format. The template is called "distracted boyfriend", and it is widely used to generate a number of memes with a common theme.

The girls are only metaphors in the meme - stand-ins for the subject-of-interest in any particular meme. i.e. they are the anthropomorphization of the thread's theme. The girls are not part of the message itself.

A more accurate to render this theme is put the text blocks in place of the heads, so that what he is choosing between is ideas, not girls. Like this:
1727287281961.png


All that matters is
a] two ideas, and
b] him choosing to turn from one to another.
The girls drop out of the equation and - for this specific meme - we are left with:

Scientists are attracted to complicated answers that are true more than simple answers that are false.
 
Last edited:
  • #3,595
nuuskur said:
checkmate you filthy globers!
I don't want to get into a debate with or about flerfers (utterly pointless, and I'm not sure it isn't 99% mass media promo), but I wonder what they think of simply calling the other end of the country at exactly sunset and asking them what the sunset looks like to them 3000 miles away.

There's no flerf geometry that could explain this.

It seems like an unusually simple way to conclusively disprove a flat Earth.

1727289206515.png
 
  • Like
Likes nuuskur and BillTre
  • #3,596
DaveC426913 said:
I wonder what they think of simply calling the other end of the country at exactly sunset and asking them what the sunset looks like to them 3000 miles away.
The Illuminati control the phone network. You can't trust that you're really talking to your friend on the other coast, not even if you establish passwords and countersigns offline - they have ears everywhere.

Fnord.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Hornbein, jack action, nuuskur and 1 other person
  • #3,597
DaveC426913 said:
I wonder what they think of simply calling the other end of the country at exactly sunset and asking them what the sunset looks like to them 3000 miles away.
You are neglecting to account for the relativity of simultaneity.
 
  • Haha
Likes pinball1970
  • #3,598
1727859832608.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes pinball1970, BillTre, jack action and 1 other person
  • #3,599
There's this statistician who decided to switch careers and start making movies. His first film is going to be called "Am I Bayesist?"
 
Last edited:
  • #3,600
Last edited:
Back
Top