Collision and Friction: Theoretical Q with Practical Implications

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around modeling the collision response of a mass point approaching a plate at an angle, considering the coefficient of restitution and friction. It questions whether the collision response can be simplified to inverting the normal velocity and applying the coefficient of restitution, or if friction must also be accounted for due to the forces exerted during the impact. The participants note that if the mass point bounces without sliding, energy loss due to friction may not occur, as displacement is zero. They reference literature on impact mechanics for deeper insights and consider the potential energy storage in springs between mass points. The conversation highlights the complexity of accurately modeling collision dynamics in physics.
Simon666
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
Theoretical question with practical implications (trying to model yarn as mass points connected with spring systems and need to get collision response with objects right):

A mass point approaches a plate under an angle. You have the coefficient of restitution β and the friction coefficient μ. You know the initial speed v of the point and can decompose it in normal component vN and tangential component vT to the surface.

What is the collision response of the mass point?

Just inverting the sign of vN and multiplying with β?

Or is there also a friction response since technically the surface and mass point exert forces on each other in an infinitely small amount of time, so an impulse reaction, and I also need to add -μ*vN to the tangential component or something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not really my field. Whole books are written on impacts, Google books suggests "Impact Mechanics" By W. J. Stronge

If the mass points bounce off without sliding over the surface then I don't think any energy is lost due to friction (work = force * displacement but the displacement is zero?).

So I think you just need to use the normal component of the velocity and the coefficient of restitution to work out the normal component of velocity after the impact.

Page 97 appears to discuss this...

http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=...oefficient of restitution at an angle&f=false

Edit: However having read that bit again ... Can the springs between the point masses store energy?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top