Collision Conservation of Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a collision problem involving two railroad cars, where one car collides with a stationary car of equal mass. The initial kinetic energy of the moving car is calculated, but confusion arises regarding the type of collision and the conservation principles involved. Participants clarify that this scenario represents an inelastic collision since the cars lock together after the impact, meaning momentum is conserved while kinetic energy is not. The importance of understanding the distinction between elastic and inelastic collisions is emphasized, along with the need to apply conservation of momentum rather than energy for this type of collision. Overall, the focus is on correcting misconceptions about collision types and the principles that govern them.
jakeginobi

Homework Statement


a 5.0 x 10^5kg railroad car moving at 8.0m/s. collides with a stationary railroad car of equal mass. after the collision the two cars lock together and slide forward. What is the final velocity of the wrecked cars?
using conservation of energy
M1 = 5.0 x 10^5 kg
M2 = 5.0 x 10^5
Vi1 = 8.0m/s
Vi2 = 0m/s
Vf = ?

Homework Equations


Ek = 1/2mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I didn't know where to start, I found the kinetic energy of the railroad car(1.6 x10^7 J) and added it to the stationary one - since it's stationary the railroad car would initially have 0 kinetic energy
 
  • Like
Likes mechpeac
Physics news on Phys.org
My teacher didn't teach us how to solve collision questions using conservation of energy
 
What type of collision does this scenario represent? What's conserved and what's not conserved in such a collision?
 
  • Like
Likes mechpeac
I believe it represents an elastic collision, and conservation of energy/momentenum is conserved. They both lock on together after collision and move as one.
 
jakeginobi said:
I believe it represents an elastic collision, and conservation of energy/momentenum is conserved. They both lock on together after collision and move as one.
Review the properties of the collision types. You've got things backwards.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top