Collision of Two Carts: What Speed After Impact?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a collision problem involving two carts, where conservation of momentum is applied to determine the final speed of the stationary cart after impact. The initial momentum equation was incorrectly set up, leading to confusion about the final velocity of the second cart. Participants clarified that the initial velocity of the second cart is zero, simplifying the calculations. Ultimately, the correct final speed of the second cart was found by recognizing the negative velocity of the first cart after the collision. The importance of properly accounting for direction in momentum calculations was emphasized.
dherm56
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
A cart (m1 = 110 kg) is moving to the right along a track at v1i = 17 m/s when it hits a stationary cart (m2 = 390 kg) and rebounds with a speed of v1f = 7 m/s in the opposite direction.
a) With what speed does the 390 kg cart move after the collision?

I used conservation of momentum, m1v1=m2v2, because there are no net external forces acting on the system. However, my answer of 1.97 is incorrect. Is there more to this problem that I'm not seeing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Conservation of momentum means that the sum of the momenta of the objects before collision equal the sum afterward. You are missing a term in the after collision side of your equation
 
I changed my equation to m1v1i + m2v2i = m1v1f + m2v2f

There is no initial velocity for m2 so that term cancels out. However, I was still unable to obtain the final velocity of m2
 
Since there is no change in momentum, then p_i=p_f. m_1v_{i}+m_2v_{i}=m_1v_{2f}+m_2v_{2f}. Note that v_i of m2 is 0

edit: you guys got it before I posted.
 
The conservation of momentum concept I understand. However, my answer of 2.82 is not correct.

I got the correct answer. I forgot that vf of m1 is negative in reference to the lab frame.

Thank you for the help
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top