Solving Collison Equations: Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter Super6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collison
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the equations for momentum and kinetic energy conservation in a two-body collision scenario. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly setting up the equations, noting that the momentum equation is a vector equation, while the energy equation is scalar. There is a suggestion to start by simplifying the equations, possibly through factoring or expanding, but clarity on the initial approach is needed. Typographical errors in the equations hinder understanding, prompting calls for clearer notation. Overall, a structured method to solve these equations is essential for accurate results.
Super6
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help show me the process of solving the equations
(m1*v1)+(M2*V2)=(m1*v1')+(M2*V2')
(.5m1*v1^2)+(.5M2*V2^2)=(.5m1*v1')+(.5M2*V2')

to get the equations

------(m1+M2) (2M2v)
v1'= --------- v1 + ----- V2
------(m1+M2) (m1+M2)


-------(2m1) (M2-m1)
V2'= --------- v1 + ----- V2
------(m1+M2) (m1+M2)


i need the algebra used or at least how i should start i know you solve one and plug it into the other, but I am not sure if i should start by factoring, expanding or what any help would be greatly appreciated
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equations are full of typographical errors, so it is to understand what you are trying to get.

One hint: conservation of momentum is a VECTOR equation, so it is actually three equations in the three components of velocity. On the other hand, the energy equation is scalar, where the velocity magnitude squared appears.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top