Color and the relation to d orbitals

AI Thread Summary
The color of transition metal compounds is primarily determined by the d orbitals through d-d transitions and charge transfer bands. These d transitions are generally weaker compared to charge transfer bands, which can lead to more intense colors in certain complexes. For example, copper blue proteins exhibit vibrant colors due to their charge transfer complexes. Understanding these concepts can be enhanced by studying Crystal Field Theory, which explains how the arrangement of ligands affects the energy levels of d orbitals. Overall, the relationship between color and d orbitals is crucial in understanding the properties of transition metal compounds.
kevin86
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I never really learned this, and it popped up yesterday. Can someone explain to me how to compound colors are all determined by the d orbitals and would it be only the d orbitals. it would be very helpful, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why would you want to hear it from us when you can read your text, from a more qualified author?

In short, you can correlate the d-spectrum of a transition metal compound (if this is what you're referring to) with its color, through subtractive mixing of the d spectrum as well as the charge transfer bands. d transitions, are relatively weaker than these transfer bands due to quantum selection rules, charge transfer complexes which absorb more or less in the visible spectra, or have spectra that overlaps the visible region slightly, have intense colors, such as the famous copper blue proteins.
 
And if it's complexes you are talking about, you may want to read up on Crystal Field Theory.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top