Column picture for representing a system of equations

vanmaiden
Messages
101
Reaction score
1
I've been dabbling with linear algebra lately and on the MIT OCW course for linear algebra, the professor talks about a column representation of a system of linear equations. For example, you teaches you to represent a

2x + 3y = 4
5x + 7y = 9

as a

x [\stackrel{2}{5}] + y [\stackrel{3}{7}] = [\stackrel{4}{9}]

The professor says one can perform this alternate way to solve a SoE, but what's the logic that allowed people to discover this new method?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pretty much basic linear algebra. The two operations we have in a vector space are "addition of vectors" and "scalar multiplication". The "x\begin{bmatrix}2 \\ 5\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}2x \\ 5x\end{bmatrix}" and "y\begin{bmatrix}3 \\ 7\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}3y \\ 7y\end{bmatrix}" are "scalar multiplications" while \begin{bmatrix}2x \\ 5x\end{bmatrix}+ \begin{bmatrix}3y \\ 7y\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}2x+ 3y\\ 5x+ 7y\end{bmatrix} is "addition of vectors". Finally, the definition of "equality" for vectors tells us that \begin{bmatrix}2x+ 3y \\ 5x+ 7y\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}4 \\ 9\end{bmatrix} is the same as "2x+ 3y= 4" and "5x+ 7y= 9".
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top