Communication using quantum entanglement

phsopher
Messages
180
Reaction score
4
As I understand it FTL communication via quantum entanglement would be impossible since it violates causality, but would it be possible to transfer information using QE slower that the speed of light? I recall reading something like that the receiver would not be able to tell whether the transmitter has done anything to his part of the entangled system and thus wouldn't be able to distinguish between the transmitter sending him information and a random measurement. Is this correct? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could only transmit information via entanglement if you could pick which state the particle on your end ends up in after you measure it. But, the nature of quantum measurement forbids this.
 
But you have to communicate information before you can achieve quantum teleportation!
 
kvl said:

But since you have to transfer classical information isn't it rather pointless communication-wise? You could include everything you want to say in the classical bit you're sending anyway.
 
phsopher said:
But since you have to transfer classical information isn't it rather pointless communication-wise? You could include everything you want to say in the classical bit you're sending anyway.

Entanglement is also used in one form of quantum cryptography - Anton Zellinger notes that "In entanglement-based quantum cryptography it leads to the most elegant possible solution of the classic key distribution problem. It implies that the key comes into existence at spatially distant location at the same time and does not need to be transported" http://meetings.aps.org/Meeting/MAR07/Event/63945. Basically Alice and Bob construct a random key from the correlated polarization measurements.

Maybe this is what you had in mind?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top