Commutator problem (position, momentum)

Kentaxel
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I'm having some difficulties with a certain commutator producing inconsistent results. Specifically I'm referring to

[p_x,x^3]

Depending on how i expand this it seems i get different coefficients, i.e

[p_x,x^3]=[p_x,x]x^2+x^2[p_x,x]=-i\hbar x^2 -x^2i\hbar=-2i\hbar x^2

However

[p_x,x^3]=[p_x,x^2]x+x[p_x,x^2]=([p_x,x]x+x[p_x,x])x+x([p_x,x]x+x[p_x,x])=-i4\hbar x^2.

Clearly I'm missing something here, but i can't quite figure out what.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The rule is ##[X,AB] = [X,A]B + A[X,B]##. You seem to be using ##[X,AB] = [X,B]A + A[X,B]## instead.
 
Put a wavefunction from the Schwartz space over the reals to the right of the commutator, use the position representation, don't use Leibniz, but only the definition and check which of the 2 results is right.
 
Yes of course, it should be

[p_x,x^3]=[p_x,x]x^2+x[p_x,x^2]=-3i\hbar x^2.

Thank you!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top