Compactness of A in R2 with Standard Topology: Tychonoff's Theorem Applied

jangoc44
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. The question is to show whether A is compact in R2 with the standard topology. A = [0,1]x{0} U {1/n, n\in Z+} x [0,1]

3. If I group the [0,1] together, I get [0,1] x {0,1/n, n \in Z+ }, and [0,1] is compact in R because of Heine Borel and {0}U{1/n} is compact since you can show that every cover has a finite subcover. Now, if you take the product of two compact sets will they still be compact? Tychonoff's theorem says product of compact spaces is compact, but I'm not too sure if it applies here.

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jangoc44 said:
A = [0,1]x{0} U {1/n, n\in Z+} x [0,1]

Where is the principal operation in the expression for A. If A\subset \mathbb{R}_2 it can't have two product operations, so I'd go for the union as it stands. But this doesn't look too likely, and doesn't seem to tie up with what you say in 3., so I suspect there may be a typo.
 
Sorry I meant ([0,1]x{0}) U ({1/n}x[0,1]).
 
OK - it was your reference to {0}U{1/n} that was throwing me a bit. Look at the points on {0}x[0,1] and go direct from the definition. (That assumes you define compact as closed and bounded, otherwise you will no doubt have proved these properties in your course from whatever definition you use.)
 
I'm off to bed now so should you have any problems hopefully someone else will pick up the thread.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top