Comparing Distance and Displacement in a Two-Child Race

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nachore
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Displacement
AI Thread Summary
Joan and Mike start at the same point and run to the other end of the street before returning. While on the way back, Joan is ahead of Mike, which affects their distances and displacements. The key point is that their displacements from the origin differ since they have not yet returned to the starting point. Joan has run a greater distance but is closer to the origin than Mike, leading to a greater distance for her but a lesser displacement. Understanding this scenario clarifies the relationship between distance and displacement in their race.
Nachore
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Two children start at one end of a street, the origin, run to the other end, then head back. On the way back Joan is ahead of Mike. Which statement is correct about the distances run and the displacements from the origin?
a. Joan has run a greater distance and her displacement is greater than Mike's.
b. Mike has run a greater distance and his displacement is greater than Joan's.
c. Joan has run a greater distance, but her displacement is less than Mike's.
d. Mike has run a greater distance, but his displacement is less than Joan's.
e. Mike has run a shorter distance, and his displacement is less than Joan's.


I really don't get this question. Aren't Joan and Mike running the same distance and displacement, because they are starting at the same place and ending at the same place?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Nachore,

Nachore said:
Two children start at one end of a street, the origin, run to the other end, then head back. On the way back Joan is ahead of Mike. Which statement is correct about the distances run and the displacements from the origin?
a. Joan has run a greater distance and her displacement is greater than Mike's.
b. Mike has run a greater distance and his displacement is greater than Joan's.
c. Joan has run a greater distance, but her displacement is less than Mike's.
d. Mike has run a greater distance, but his displacement is less than Joan's.
e. Mike has run a shorter distance, and his displacement is less than Joan's.


I really don't get this question. Aren't Joan and Mike running the same distance and displacement, because they are starting at the same place and ending at the same place?

I think they mean for you to answer this question after they are both on the way back, but before they have reached the origin. What do you get?
 
alphysicist's suggestion makes sense. If we consider the time interval to be from t=0 to the point in the word problem where Joan is ahead of Mike (and we stop our time interval there. We're not considering anything further. Our analysis is just from the time they start, until the time described in the problem. They have not yet made it back to the origin), the problem makes sense. In this situation, the are starting at the same point, but end at differing points. At the end of the time interval we're looking at, Joan is nearer to the origin than Mike, and so the problem can be solved.

Hope that helps :)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top