Comparing Fourier Transforms of Rectangle and Triangular Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter UrbanXrisis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fourier
UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



For a visual of what I am talking about, please visit: http://webhost.etc.tuiasi.ro/cin/Downloads/Fourier/Fourier.html
and scroll down to the "Examples of Fourier Transforms" part

I am ask to explain why the Fourier transform on the rectangle function was similar to the Fourier transform on the trangular function.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



so here what I think, and I'm not totally sure about it. The FT of a rectangular function is sin and rhe FT of the trangular function is a sin^2. The FT are similar because both functions are even, symetric, and always positive. The rectangular function is a constant function, which gives the sin, while the trangular function is a linear function, which gives the sin^2. Maybe a x^2 function with bounds will give a sin^3? not really sure about that. Is my reasoning correct for why the two FTs are similar?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can't you calculate the FT of x^2 function? it should be easy..
define a function bx^2 between -a and a , and see what the FT would be..
 
ok i did it, and it does show that it would be sin^3

know this, why is it that the higher the power, the larger n is for sin^n?
 
First notice that the transform of a square pulse is sin(aw)/(aw) which is called sinc(aw). It is not the same as a simple sine.

To answer your question, here's a different approach--think in terms of convolutions. The convolution of a square pulse with itself is what? (It should be in your book.) Therefore what is the transform of the convolution?

As for x^2, how would you produce that with a convolution and what is its transform?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
Back
Top