Comparing Kinetic Energy of N2 and CO2 Molecules at Ambient Conditions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the kinetic energy of nitrogen (N2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) molecules at ambient conditions. It is concluded that CO2 molecules have less kinetic energy than N2 molecules due to their higher mass, which results in slower speeds. The relationship between temperature and kinetic energy is highlighted, noting that increased temperature leads to faster molecular movement and higher kinetic energy. Participants clarify that the kinetic energy of a gas is directly related to its temperature, reinforcing the initial conclusion. Overall, the justification regarding the kinetic energy comparison is deemed accurate.
chemistry1
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
Two identical bottles contain the same number of molecules at ambiant conditions of temperature and pression.The first contains N2, and the second CO2.Tell if the it's true/false and explain why

The molecules of CO2 have more kinetic energy than the molecules of N2.

My answer : False because if we consider the mass of each sort of molecules, we see clearly that a molecule of N2 is 28,02 of mass unit while CO2 is 44,01 mass unit. The latter having a bigger mass, it clearly goes at a lower speed, which results in having less kinetic energy.

Would this justification be any good ?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How is the energy of the molecule related to the temperature?
 
Well, if the temparture gets higher the molecules tend to move faster and produces more kinetic energy.Atleast, that's what I understood from reading my things...
 
I don't know any calculus :/ But is my interpretation any good??
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top