Comparing Postgrad Programs in Mathematics: Cambridge vs. Other UK Universities

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bleys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cambridge
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the application process for Master's programs in mathematics, particularly focusing on the Part III MASt at Cambridge. The original poster expresses interest in algebra and number theory while seeking a rigorous program to prepare for PhD studies. They mention hearing mixed reviews about the Part III program, including concerns about its perceived prestige, ease of admission, and its suitability for research preparation, especially compared to other institutions like Imperial and Warwick, which are noted for their strong math departments and more manageable finances.Participants in the discussion share their own experiences and considerations regarding Master's programs, with one participant already enrolled in the Part III program and another contemplating a joint Master's in Physics. The conversation highlights the importance of evaluating financial implications and the potential benefits of pursuing a PhD directly versus completing a Master's first. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for careful consideration of program quality and alignment with future academic goals.
Bleys
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
Hello there.
I'm currently applying to several Master's programs in mathematics around the UK (and also elsewhere in Europe). I'm interested in algebra or (algebraic) number theory, but I'm keeping my options open to explore more areas before I consider, and apply for, doctorate studies (which is why I'm going through a master's to begin with).

Now I've applied to Cambridge for the Part III MASt. I had only heard about this program in December from someone who was attending. He swore by it. I looked through it and it seemed very promising: very wide selection of courses, and from what I hear it's tough (and I'm really keen on some demanding regiment, because Bachelor studies at my uni was not what I expected; you know, routine assignments and exams (I'm guessing to have the required pass rate of students), tough/interesting material omitted or not included in assessments, etc...).

But I've been reading on some forums and around, and now I'm not really sure anymore. I've heard some pretty negative things, like: overrated (particularly because of prestige), the part III is easy to enter ergo not what it's cracked up to be, 100% taught is not good preparation for research, part III is aimed more at DAMTP. Now I don't know what to think.

I've applied to Imperial and Warwick as well, which my professors told me have very good math departments (not to mention finances there are somewhat more doable for me, though that's not a big issue).

I just want a solid master's program which will give me some good basis for PhD studies. I'd appreciate any constructive input.
Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi!
I don't know if any conversation is useful now, have you already chosen?
I write because I am in a situation that is a little bit similar to yours.

Let me know if you want.
Bye!
 
Hi, I read you PM only a few days ago, had no notification.
I have written here to let you be notified!
Thanks for answer :-)
 
Bleys said:
Hello there.
I'm currently applying to several Master's programs in mathematics around the UK (and also elsewhere in Europe). I'm interested in algebra or (algebraic) number theory, but I'm keeping my options open to explore more areas before I consider, and apply for, doctorate studies

Why not just go straight for the PhD? I wish I had! You've spotted some problems with doing part III or MSc - there are others. For instance - check the finance implications carefully.
 
Hi Mal4Mac
If you are talking to Bleys, he is already doing the PartIII!

If you are talking to me, I am not sure I would prefer the PartIII of Maths, I am considering the PartIII of Physics and also a 2-years joint Master at ETHZ-EP Paris if I decide to go into Particle Physics.
What do you study?
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top