Comparing Stability of Allylic Carbanions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the stability of allylic carbanions formed from the cleavage of C-H bonds. It highlights that carbon's electronegativity leads to the formation of carbanions, with resonance playing a key role in their stability. Specifically, cleavage at position 'b' produces a more stable allylic carbanion compared to position 'a', which results in a vinylic carbanion. The participants clarify that positions 'b' and 'd' are relevant for producing allylic carbanions, with 'b' being the most stable. Overall, the resonance stabilization significantly influences the stability of the resulting carbanions.
gpavanb
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Look at the diagram accompanying the question. Which has least C-H bond energy?


The Attempt at a Solution


On cleavage of a C-H bond, a carbanion is formed as carbon is more electronegative than hydrogen. So cleavage of (b) results in a carbanion stabilized by resonance
 

Attachments

  • dbt.jpg
    dbt.jpg
    4.9 KB · Views: 441
Physics news on Phys.org
gpavanb said:

Homework Statement


Look at the diagram accompanying the question. Which has least C-H bond energy?


The Attempt at a Solution


On cleavage of a C-H bond, a carbanion is formed as carbon is more electronegative than hydrogen. So cleavage of (b) results in a carbanion stabilized by resonance

You can form 2 allylic (stabilized by resonance) carbanions (a and b). Which one is most stable?
 
Cleavage of a results in a vinylic carbanion. b forms the more stable allylic carbanion
 
Sorry, I read that wrong. It should have been position 'b' and 'd' produce the allylic carbanions. Which one is most stable?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top