Schools Comparing toughness of physics grad schools

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on evaluating the difficulty of graduate physics courses across different universities. A student reflects on their experience in a quantum mechanics course that is perceived to be as challenging as those at prestigious institutions like MIT or Princeton. They express surprise at their performance, achieving better grades despite the high difficulty level, which raises questions about the comparative rigor of their program. The professor's intent is to ensure that graduates are competitive for PhD programs, avoiding the need for remedial work. Participants mention that some top universities do publish their coursework online, providing a resource for comparison. The conversation highlights the challenges of assessing academic rigor across institutions and the importance of maintaining high standards in graduate education.
Pengwuino
Gold Member
Messages
5,112
Reaction score
20
Comparing "toughness" of physics grad schools

I was wondering if anyone knows any good ways of finding out how one's courses (specifically grad classes) stacks up against other universities? My undergrad courses were probably a 5 on a 1-10 scale of what i can imagine would be the typical difficulties you'd see in an American university. Now I enter into my grad first semester QM course and a friend of mine who already received his MS tells me and a couple friends that this professor who teaches the course attempts to put the difficulty at what you'd see at a place like MIT or Princeton. I thought "yah, right, whatever". I start the semester off thinking that hey, it's grad school, it's going to be a new ballgame, a step up, etc etc. From the get-go this class has been like a shotgun blast to the face yet I'm achieving better grades on assignments than ever before (our midterm we just took, I may have been the only one to finish). Thus, I'm really wondering if my friend was right and now I'm looking to see if there's a way to actually compare my program or at least my course with courses at top universities. I highly doubt universities publish their grad course homeworks/test/lectures...

The thinking behind my professor bumping up the difficulty is supposedly so that since you can only get a MS at my university, they want to produce students that are of the caliber of students entering into any PhD program in the country and wouldn't have to play catchup.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a lot of top schools actually do publish their course work

http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Physics/8-04Spring-2006/CourseHome/index.htm

http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Physics/8-321Quantum-Theory-IFall2002/CourseHome/index.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Nice, that prof uses Sakurai too :)
 


im surprised they use modern sakurai and not advanced sakurai.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top