Comparing Vibrating and Oscillating Energy of Tuning Forks

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between vibrating and oscillating energy in tuning forks, asserting that they are nearly synonymous, with oscillation being a specific type of vibration. The energy in a tuning fork transitions between elastic potential and kinetic forms as it vibrates, diminishing over time due to sound emission. A question posed compares the vibrational energy of a 660-Hz tuning fork (0.04 J) to that of an atomic oscillator emitting orange light at 5.00x10^14 Hz, highlighting a potential misunderstanding regarding the differences in energy types. Participants clarify that the question is about comparing energy quanta of two distinct oscillators rather than suggesting the tuning fork has different energies. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the need for clarity in understanding energy comparisons between various oscillating systems.
asdf1
Messages
734
Reaction score
0
is the vibrating energy of a tuning fork the same as the oscillating energy of a tuning fork?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general, I'd say yes. An oscillation is a periodic vibration, so "vibration" is more general, and "oscillation" is more specific, but they are almost synonyms. The energy will be changing between elastic potential and kinetic energies as the fork tines move back and forth, of course this energy diminishes over time due to the sound that emits.
 
that's what i think too~

but in this question that a posted about a month ago,

"Assume that a certain 660-Hz tuning fork can be considered as a harmonic oscillator whose vibrational energy is 0.04 J. Compare the energy quanta of this tuning fork with those of an atomic osillator that emits and absorbs orange light whose frequency is 5.00*10^14 Hz."

i still don't understand why the tuning fork has different vibrational and oscillating energy...
 
asdf1 said:
that's what i think too~

but in this question that a posted about a month ago,

"Assume that a certain 660-Hz tuning fork can be considered as a harmonic oscillator whose vibrational energy is 0.04 J. Compare the energy quanta of this tuning fork with those of an atomic osillator that emits and absorbs orange light whose frequency is 5.00*10^14 Hz."

i still don't understand why the tuning fork has different vibrational and oscillating energy...

I don't see anything in your quote that says it does! It is asking you to campare the energy quanta of two different oscillators- one with 660 Hz frequency and the other with the much higher 5.00x 1014 Hz.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top