Compensating for Doppler Effect in Moving Car: Formula and Graphing

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving a formula to compensate for the Doppler effect experienced by a stationary observer as a car moves past at 50 mph. The initial approach involves rewriting the Doppler formula to express the source frequency in terms of the observed frequency while incorporating the car's velocity component towards the observer. A key point of confusion arises around the angle θ and its relationship to the distance from the observer, leading to adjustments in the velocity expression. After several iterations and suggestions, a corrected version of the velocity function is found that aligns with expected graph behavior. The final consensus is that the revised approach successfully addresses the Doppler effect compensation.
bwinter
Messages
27
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Trying to find the formula to generate a sin wave that would compensate for the Doppler effect if played from a car moving 50 mph past a stationary observer 1 meter from the car's path.

Homework Equations


ƒ_{observed} = \frac{v}{v+v_{s}}ƒ_{source}

The Attempt at a Solution


Tried to work this out using variables first. Say d is the distance from observer to car's path.

First, we want to keep the observed frequency constant, so rewrite Doppler formula for source:
ƒ_{source} = \frac{v+v_{s}}{v}ƒ_{observed}

Then, taking the component of the car's velocity towards the observer
V_{o} = V_{s}cosθ

Where θ is the angle between the car's path, and the direct line of sight to the observer.

But we want this in terms of d, time t and Vs, so we can rewrite θ thusly

θ=tan^{-1}(\frac{d}{V_{s}t})

And then plugging back into Vo, we get
V_{o}=\frac{V_{s}}{\sqrt{(\frac{d}{V_{s}t})^{2}+1}}

So plug this back into our Doppler equation.

ƒ_{s}=\frac{v+\frac{V_{s}}{\sqrt{(\frac{d}{V_{s}t})^{2}+1}}}{v}ƒ_{o}

I've tried graphing this using ƒobserved=440 Hz and Vs=22 m/s, and the graph is symmetrical about t = 0, when it obviously should not be. I'm not sure where I'm going wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your expression for ##\theta## in terms of ##d##, ##V_s##, and ##t##. Are you sure that's what you want?
 
Why wouldn't it be? Tan gives me opposite and adjacent components which are d and tVs. Are you saying it should be sin or cos?
 
Consider the sign of your expression for ##V_o## as you pass ##t=0##.
 
Am I approaching this the right way? I don't see what else theta can be written as.

would writing it in terms of cosine make sense? then V_{o}=\frac{V_{s}^{2}t}{\sqrt{d^{2}+V_{s}^{2}t^{2}}}
 
Last edited:
Your approach is fine, but you have to be a bit careful. Try plotting ##V_o## vs ##t##. Is it what you expect?
 
Yes! this new Vo works. Thanks!
 
Back
Top