Competitive exam Question: Work done to shorten string

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done in shortening a string attached to a rotating particle. Participants explore the relationship between angular momentum, velocity, and radius, concluding that as the radius decreases, the velocity increases due to the conservation of angular momentum. The proposed solution involves integrating the force with respect to displacement, leading to a formula for work done. One participant confirms that their calculations align with the derived solution, seeking further verification from others. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly expressing variables in the context of the problem.
adeelrizvi
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Q) A particle of mass 'm' attached to a string rotates with velocity Vo when the length of the string is Ro. How much work is done in shortening the string to R?

One way I thought about doing this was:
W= {(m*r*w^2) * r}dr and integrate this from R to Ro
But I am not sure if that is correct. So if someone can help me with this question I will really appreciate it.
Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds good.
What happens to the velocity as r decreases?
I suppose angular momentum will be conserved.
 
You think my solution is correct? Can someone else also please confirm this.

v=rw, w is constant. r decreases so v decreases as well. Correct me if I am wrong.

Angular momentum I believe is conserved.
 
v=rw, w is constant.
I don't think w is constant. The constant is k = mrv so v = k/(mr)
and w = v/r = k/(mr^2).

r decreases so v decreases as well.
v increases as r decreases.
 
I guess you are right. I was taking the wrong assumption. If angular momentum is conserved then velocity increases if radius decreases.
Now when you have corrected me I think my solution to the problem was not correct either. Can you please verify that for me as well?
Thanks
 
I haven't seen a solution yet. I just agreed that integrating Force*dr would be the way to do it. And you have to be careful to express v or w in terms of k and r because v and w are not a constants.
 
Solution:

dW= F.dr
dW= {(m*v^2)/r}dr (v=k/mr)
dW= {(k^2/m)*(1*r^3)}dr
Integrate this with limits Ro to R

W = [(k^2)/(2m)]*[(1/Ro^2) - (1/R^2)] <----Answer

Please check and let me know if this seems correct to you?
Thanks
 
That is precisely what I got!
Of course I am not infallible! I'm just a retired high school teacher missing the good feeling of helping my students.
 
I really appreciate your help. I hope we are correct but it will be good to know if someone else here can verify our solution.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
767
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
712
Back
Top