Complex analysis, graph inequality

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
Fellowroot
Messages
92
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Sketch the graph

|Re(z)|>2

Homework Equations



z=x+iy

The Attempt at a Solution



|Re(z)|>2

|Re(x+iy)|>2

|x|>2

|x-0|>2, this is a circle centered at zero with radius 2

4. My question

What I'm having a hard time with is the | | notation.
Is this the absolute value, or modulus, or something else.

Wolfram Alpha says its an absolute value graph (that I understand) but my books says this is the form of a circle. Which is it?
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=|Re(z)|>2

I graphed a circle on my paper r=2 at (0,0) but I don't know which part to shade, the inside of the circle or the outside? How can I plug in numbers to test True and False? I know how to graph inequalities in real but complex I'm having trouble with.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have no idea what Wolfram Alpha is thinking about. Ignore it, please? || is modulus or absolute value. They are really the same thing. |x|>2 is perfectly correct. But it's not a circle at all. x=2 is a line, x=(-2) is another line. Those are the boundaries of your region, yes?
 
I now see why |x|>2 is NOT a circle.

I got it confused with this formula |z-z[itex]_{0}[/itex]|=[itex]\rho[/itex]

Because |z|>2 is a circle.

And I still have a hard time seeing why |z|>2 is a circle.
 
Fellowroot said:
I now see why |x|>2 is NOT a circle.

I got it confused with this formula |z-z[itex]_{0}[/itex]|=[itex]\rho[/itex]

Because |z|>2 is a circle.

And I still have a hard time seeing why |z|>2 is a circle.

|z|=|x+iy|=sqrt(x^2+y^2). Do you know that? sqrt(x^2+y^2)=2 is the same as x^2+y^2=4. Do you see why x^2+y^2=4 is a circle?
 
Yes, I see now.

Thank you.