Complex Analysis Q&A - Singularities, Integration and More

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on fundamental questions in complex analysis, specifically regarding singularities of complex functions and the integration of functions along curves in the complex plane. Participants explore definitions, mathematical expressions, and the implications of these concepts in various contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that singularities of a complex function are points where the function fails to be analytic, but questions whether these points are always where the numerator is zero.
  • Another participant corrects this by indicating that singularities for rational functions occur where the denominator is zero, and provides examples of other functions with singularities.
  • Discussion includes the need to specify a curve C for integration in the complex plane and the correct form of integrals for arc length.
  • One participant provides a detailed expression for the line integral and discusses the relationship between the integral and arc length, but later revises their explanation regarding the arc length calculation.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on the arc length of the unit circle, presenting a specific integral and parameterization.
  • Further calculations are provided to confirm the relationship between the derivatives and the arc length in the context of the unit circle parameterization.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the definition of singularities and the need for parameterization in integration, but there is some confusion regarding the conditions under which singularities occur and the correct formulation of integrals for arc length. The discussion remains unresolved on certain aspects, particularly regarding the correct interpretation of integrals.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the correct forms of integrals and the implications of singularities in different contexts. There are also mixed understandings regarding the relationship between the numerator and denominator in defining singularities.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi all.

I have some questions on complex analysis. They are very fundemental.

1) Singularities of a complex functions are the points, where the functions fails to be analytic. Will a singularity then always be a point, where the numerator of the functions is zero?

2) This question is on integration in the complex plane. If have a function f(z), then I have to specify the curve C (parametrized by z(t)), on which I wish to integrate f(z) along. If I just want to find the length of the curve, then which of the following integrals are correct?

[tex] \int dz \quad \quad \text{or}\quad \quad \int z(t) dz.[/tex]

I hope you can help. I would very much appreciate it.Niles.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps it would me more appropriate if this question was in the "Calculus and beyond"-homework forum. Would a moderator be kind enough to move the thread over there?
 
are you looking at this stuff because of the born scattering section in griffiths? lol

you are correct that a singularity of a function is a point where the function fails to be analytic but you are incorrect in saying that it's where the numerator is zero. for a rational function the singularities are where the denominator is zero. for other function it isn't necessarily so. for example [itex]y^2=x[/itex] has a singularity at (0,0) because the slope is infinite there. |x| also has a singularity at (0,0).

for a line integral in complex space you need to specify a path z(t) where t is the parameter hence the path z is parameterized somehow by t.

in the integral it looks like this:

[tex]\int f(z)dz =\int f(z(t))\frac{dz}{dt}dt = \int f(z(t))z'(t)dt[/tex]

you can think of dz as a line element and hence the arc length is just

[tex]\int dz =\int z'(t)dt[/tex]

edit

actually that's wrong

since the line integral over complex space is the integral over a sort of vector field the definition i wrote down is correct. finding the arc length though corresponds to a line integral over a scalar field hence to find the arc length it should look like this:

[tex]\int |dz| =\int |z'(t)|dt =\int \sqrt{z'(t)*z'(t)^*}dt = \int \sqrt{u'(x(t),y(t))^2+v'(x(t),y(t))^2}dt[/tex]

where the star in the exponent of the second z'(t) in the middle exression is complex conjugation.
 
Last edited:
1) I actually meant the denominator (the lower part of the fraction), but I got the two terms mixed up.

2) So if I want to find the arc length of the unit circle, then it is given by:

[tex] \int_0^{2\pi} (\cos t + i\sin t)(-\sin t + i\cos t)dt ?[/tex]

Thanks.
 
Niles said:
1) I actually meant the denominator (the lower part of the fraction), but I got the two terms mixed up.

2) So if I want to find the arc length of the unit circle, then it is given by:

[tex] \int_0^{2\pi} (\cos t + i\sin t)(-\sin t + i\cos t)dt ?[/tex]

Thanks.

if the parameterization you're using is [itex]z(t)=\cos(t)+i\sin(t)[/itex] then

[tex]z'(t) = -\sin(t)+i\cos(t)[/tex]
[tex]z'(t)*= -\sint(t)-i\cos(t)[/tex]
[tex]z'(t)*z'(t)= \sin^2(t) +i\cos(t)\sin(t)-i\sin(t)\cos(t)+\cos^2(t) =\sin^2(t) +cos^2(t)[/tex]
[tex]|dz| =\sqrt{z'(t)*z'(t)}dt =\sqrt{\sin^2(t) +\cos^2(t)}dt = dt[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K