Complex Exponential: Why is e Used?

Repetit
Messages
128
Reaction score
2
Hey!

I was wondering, is it merely a definition that

e^{ix}= cos(x) + i sin(x)

or is it actually important that it is the number e which is used as base for the exponential?

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Have a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_formula" :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No, it's not a definition, yes, it is important the "e" be the base of the exponentials. That formula can be derived from the Taylor's series for ex, cos x, and sin x. Taylor's series depends upon the derivatives and the derivative of ex happens to be ex itself. The derivative of ax is axln(a) so corresponding formulas are more complicated.
For similar reasons, it is also important that the argument in the sine and cosine be interpreted as radian measure, not degrees.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top