Complex Limit Definition: Trying to Remember

fauboca
Messages
157
Reaction score
0
Trying to remember how to use the definition of a complex limit.

\lim_{\Delta z\to 0}\frac{f(z+h)-f(z)}{\Delta z}

f(z) = |z| = \sqrt{x^2+y^2}

\Delta z = \Delta x + i\Delta y

\lim_{\Delta x\to 0}\frac{\sqrt{(x+\Delta x)^2+(y+\Delta y)^2}- \sqrt{x^2+y^2}}{\Delta x}

Is that correct? Or do I just have the delta x with the x? Or is there a x + delta x and y + delta y?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, that is almost the correct formula. The only things missing are that you need to take the limit as both \Delta x, \Delta y go to 0 and the denominator must be \sqrt{(\Delta x)^2+ (/Delta y)^2}, the distance from (\Delta x, \Delta y) to (0, 0), and you have to take the limit without assuming a relation between \Delta x and \Delta y. Strictly spealing, we take the limit as the point (\Delta x, \Delta y) goes to (0, 0) along any possible path in two dimensions.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Well, that is almost the correct formula. The only thing missing is that you need to take the limit as both \Delta x, \Delta y go to 0. And you have to take the limit without assuming a relation between \Delta x and \Delta y. Strictly spealing, we take the limit as the point (\Delta x, \Delta y) goes to (0, 0) along any possible path in two dimensions.

So the denominator is \Delta x + \Delta y then?
 
Sorry, you posted while I was editing my post- the denominator should be the distance from the point (\Delta x, \Delta y) to (0, 0):
\sqrt{(\Delta x)^2+ (\Delta y)^2}

That is difficult to calculate. What is often done is to asssume that the function is differentable so that the limits along, say, parallel to the real axis or parallel to the imaginary axis are sufficient.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top